THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF HAPPINESS IN KAZAKH AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

This article explores the national and cultural specificities of the concept of “happiness” in Kazakh and English through a comparative linguocultural and cognitive analysis. The research is grounded in a qualitative paradigm and aims to uncover the relationship between language and culture, as well as the unique features of national worldviews. The main objective is to identify the conceptual structure, semantic field, metaphorical models, and national-cultural representations of the notion of “happiness” in both languages. The analysis includes three main components: an etymological overview, a linguocultural examination based on paremiology and set expressions, and the interpretation of data from a semistructured survey. Paremiological analysis shows that in Kazakh, “baqyt” is often portrayed as a gift or blessing that comes from outside (“the bird of happiness”, “fortune shines”), while in English, “ happiness” is typically viewed as a state resulting from personal action and choice (“Happiness is a choice”, “Happiness blooms from within”). The metaphorical models associated with happiness in Kazakh include “light”, “bird”, “blessing”, and “gift of fate”, whereas in English, the metaphors revolve around “path”, “flower”, “light”, “choice”, and “product”. The survey was conducted in Almaty and East Lansing, with responses from 30 Kazakh-speaking and 30 English-speaking participants. The interview questions focused on the personal and cultural perceptions of happiness. The semantic dominants, motivational characteristics, and cultural associations of the concept differ significantly between the two languages. The methodological framework of the study includes interpretive-phenomenological analysis, conceptual metaphor theory, as well as comparative and discourse-based linguistic approaches. The research material consisted of data from literary texts, proverbs, idioms, and natural discourse. The entire text and survey response data were plotted with Python in the Jupyter Notebook.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tiltanym
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-3-61-73
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF HAPPINESS IN KAZAKH AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

Tiltanym
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF HAPPINESS IN KAZAKH AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

article en

Abstract

This article explores the national and cultural specificities of the concept of “happiness” in Kazakh and English through a comparative linguocultural and cognitive analysis. The research is grounded in a qualitative paradigm and aims to uncover the relationship between language and culture, as well as the unique features of national worldviews. The main objective is to identify the conceptual structure, semantic field, metaphorical models, and national-cultural representations of the notion of “happiness” in both languages. The analysis includes three main components: an etymological overview, a linguocultural examination based on paremiology and set expressions, and the interpretation of data from a semistructured survey. Paremiological analysis shows that in Kazakh, “baqyt” is often portrayed as a gift or blessing that comes from outside (“the bird of happiness”, “fortune shines”), while in English, “ happiness” is typically viewed as a state resulting from personal action and choice (“Happiness is a choice”, “Happiness blooms from within”). The metaphorical models associated with happiness in Kazakh include “light”, “bird”, “blessing”, and “gift of fate”, whereas in English, the metaphors revolve around “path”, “flower”, “light”, “choice”, and “product”. The survey was conducted in Almaty and East Lansing, with responses from 30 Kazakh-speaking and 30 English-speaking participants. The interview questions focused on the personal and cultural perceptions of happiness. The semantic dominants, motivational characteristics, and cultural associations of the concept differ significantly between the two languages. The methodological framework of the study includes interpretive-phenomenological analysis, conceptual metaphor theory, as well as comparative and discourse-based linguistic approaches. The research material consisted of data from literary texts, proverbs, idioms, and natural discourse. The entire text and survey response data were plotted with Python in the Jupyter Notebook.

Tiltanym(3)
Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.