Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Methods, Challenges, and a Conceptual Framework

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is vital for enabling trust, transparency, and accountability in medical decision support systems. This paper provides a conceptual survey of core XAI techniques— such as LIME, SHAP, Integrated Gradients, Grad-CAM, counterfactual explanations, and concept activation—and analyzes their theoretical foundations, strengths, and limitations in healthcare settings. We further discuss major challenges unique to clinical deployment: explanation validation, human-AI interaction, trust calibration, and regulatory compliance. To guide researchers and practitioners, we propose a conceptual framework mapping XAI methods by clinical task (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment decision), data modality (tabular, imaging, multimodal), and explanation scope (local vs global). We conclude with recommendations for future work: benchmark datasets for explanation evaluation, multimodal interpretation, human‐centered studies, and integration with causal reasoning.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17357263
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Methods, Challenges, and a Conceptual Framework

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Methods, Challenges, and a Conceptual Framework

article en

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is vital for enabling trust, transparency, and accountability in medical decision support systems. This paper provides a conceptual survey of core XAI techniques— such as LIME, SHAP, Integrated Gradients, Grad-CAM, counterfactual explanations, and concept activation—and analyzes their theoretical foundations, strengths, and limitations in healthcare settings. We further discuss major challenges unique to clinical deployment: explanation validation, human-AI interaction, trust calibration, and regulatory compliance. To guide researchers and practitioners, we propose a conceptual framework mapping XAI methods by clinical task (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment decision), data modality (tabular, imaging, multimodal), and explanation scope (local vs global). We conclude with recommendations for future work: benchmark datasets for explanation evaluation, multimodal interpretation, human‐centered studies, and integration with causal reasoning.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.