Evaluation of CAD and Slicer Software Combination in Modeling Additive Manufactured Geometries in Fused Deposition Modeling

ABSTRACT The advancements in additive manufacturing technologies have revolutionized the manufacturing industry in recent years, enabling unprecedented design flexibility and also simultaneously accelerating the production time of individual components. The differences in the pre‐processing phase have been argued to have a significant influence on the production quality of the 3D‐printed part. Moreover, the interface between the CAD software and the slicing software is decisive for the quality of the generated G‐code, which is used in 3D printing. This work aims to evaluate multiple commercial and open‐source CAD platforms and review their functionality in designing 3D models and their inherent complexities for additive manufacturing by FDM. A specimen design was modeled using multiple commercial and open‐source CAD platforms in combination with slicer software. The G‐codes for the selected software platforms were generated and analyzed to evaluate the accuracy and flexibility in designing amongst the selected CAD platforms in combination with the slicer software. From the study, significant insights were gained about the relative strengths of the individual CAD and slicer combinations and also their inherent drawbacks. This data was used to evaluate the combinations in terms of the accuracy and design flexibility of each of these combinations. Such an analysis of the aforementioned software tools can provide significant insights into the optimization of the additive manufacturing process and contribute towards the efficient conversion of 3D designs into functional parts. Furthermore, this comparison and evaluation of the CAD software can play a crucial role in both visualizing and realizing the additive manufacturing process.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Macromolecular Symposia
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.70118
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of CAD and Slicer Software Combination in Modeling Additive Manufactured Geometries in Fused Deposition Modeling

Macromolecular Symposia
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Evaluation of CAD and Slicer Software Combination in Modeling Additive Manufactured Geometries in Fused Deposition Modeling

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The advancements in additive manufacturing technologies have revolutionized the manufacturing industry in recent years, enabling unprecedented design flexibility and also simultaneously accelerating the production time of individual components. The differences in the pre‐processing phase have been argued to have a significant influence on the production quality of the 3D‐printed part. Moreover, the interface between the CAD software and the slicing software is decisive for the quality of the generated G‐code, which is used in 3D printing. This work aims to evaluate multiple commercial and open‐source CAD platforms and review their functionality in designing 3D models and their inherent complexities for additive manufacturing by FDM. A specimen design was modeled using multiple commercial and open‐source CAD platforms in combination with slicer software. The G‐codes for the selected software platforms were generated and analyzed to evaluate the accuracy and flexibility in designing amongst the selected CAD platforms in combination with the slicer software. From the study, significant insights were gained about the relative strengths of the individual CAD and slicer combinations and also their inherent drawbacks. This data was used to evaluate the combinations in terms of the accuracy and design flexibility of each of these combinations. Such an analysis of the aforementioned software tools can provide significant insights into the optimization of the additive manufacturing process and contribute towards the efficient conversion of 3D designs into functional parts. Furthermore, this comparison and evaluation of the CAD software can play a crucial role in both visualizing and realizing the additive manufacturing process.

Macromolecular SymposiaVol. 414(5)
Merseburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), Shandong Institute of Business and Technology (CN)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of CAD and Slicer Software Combination in Modeling Additive Manufactured Geometries in Fused Deposition Modeling · Macromolecular Symposia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS