On the validity of intermediate tracing in multiple quantum interactions

Interactions between many (initially separate) quantum systems raise the question on how to prepare and how to compute the measurable results of their interaction. When one prepares each system individually and let them interact, one has to tensor multiply their density matrices and apply Hamiltonians on the composite system (i.e. the system which includes all the interacting systems) for definite time intervals. Evaluating the final state of one of the systems after multiple consecutive interactions, requires tracing all other systems out of the composite system, which may grow up to immense dimensions. For computation efficiency during the interaction(s) one may consider only the contemporary interacting partial systems, while tracing out the other non interacting systems. In concrete terms, the type of problems to which we direct this formulation is a ``target'' system interacting {\bf succesively} with ``incident'' systems, where the ``incident'' systems do not mutually interact. For example a two-level atom, interacting succesively with free electrons, or a resonant cavity interacting with radiatively free electrons, or a quantum dot interacting succesively with photons. We refer to a ``system'' as one of the components before interaction, while each interaction creates a ``composite system''. A new interaction of the ``composite system'' with another ``system'' creates a ``larger composite system'', unless we trace out one of the systems before this interaction. The scope of this work is to show that under proper conditions one may add a system to the composite system just before it interacts, and one may trace out this very system after it finishes to interact. We show in this work a mathematical proof of the above property and give a computational example.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-10-11
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Chemical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the validity of intermediate tracing in multiple quantum interactions

ArXiv.org
Biomedical and Chemical Research
article

On the validity of intermediate tracing in multiple quantum interactions

article en

Abstract

Interactions between many (initially separate) quantum systems raise the question on how to prepare and how to compute the measurable results of their interaction. When one prepares each system individually and let them interact, one has to tensor multiply their density matrices and apply Hamiltonians on the composite system (i.e. the system which includes all the interacting systems) for definite time intervals. Evaluating the final state of one of the systems after multiple consecutive interactions, requires tracing all other systems out of the composite system, which may grow up to immense dimensions. For computation efficiency during the interaction(s) one may consider only the contemporary interacting partial systems, while tracing out the other non interacting systems. In concrete terms, the type of problems to which we direct this formulation is a ``target'' system interacting {\bf succesively} with ``incident'' systems, where the ``incident'' systems do not mutually interact. For example a two-level atom, interacting succesively with free electrons, or a resonant cavity interacting with radiatively free electrons, or a quantum dot interacting succesively with photons. We refer to a ``system'' as one of the components before interaction, while each interaction creates a ``composite system''. A new interaction of the ``composite system'' with another ``system'' creates a ``larger composite system'', unless we trace out one of the systems before this interaction. The scope of this work is to show that under proper conditions one may add a system to the composite system just before it interacts, and one may trace out this very system after it finishes to interact. We show in this work a mathematical proof of the above property and give a computational example.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Biomedical and Chemical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.