A Black-Box Debiasing Framework for Conditional Sampling

Conditional sampling is a fundamental task in Bayesian statistics and generative modeling. Consider the problem of sampling from the posterior distribution $P_{X|Y=y^*}$ for some observation $y^*$, where the likelihood $P_{Y|X}$ is known, and we are given $n$ i.i.d. samples $D=\{X_i\}_{i=1}^n$ drawn from an unknown prior distribution $π_X$. Suppose that $f(\hatπ_{X^n})$ is the distribution of a posterior sample generated by an algorithm (e.g. a conditional generative model or the Bayes rule) when $\hatπ_{X^n}$ is the empirical distribution of the training data. Although averaging over the randomness of the training data $D$, we have $\mathbb{E}_D\left(\hatπ_{X^n}\right)= π_X$, we do not have $\mathbb{E}_D\left\{f(\hatπ_{X^n})\right\}= f(π_X)$ due to the nonlinearity of $f$, leading to a bias. In this paper we propose a black-box debiasing scheme that improves the accuracy of such a naive plug-in approach. For any integer $k$ and under boundedness of the likelihood and smoothness of $f$, we generate samples $\hat{X}^{(1)},\dots,\hat{X}^{(k)}$ and weights $w_1,\dots,w_k$ such that $\sum_{i=1}^kw_iP_{\hat{X}^{(i)}}$ is a $k$-th order approximation of $f(π_X)$, where the generation process treats $f$ as a black-box. Our generation process achieves higher accuracy when averaged over the randomness of the training data, without degrading the variance, which can be interpreted as improving memorization without compromising generalization in generative models.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-10-13
Primary Topic
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Black-Box Debiasing Framework for Conditional Sampling

ArXiv.org
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
article

A Black-Box Debiasing Framework for Conditional Sampling

article en

Abstract

Conditional sampling is a fundamental task in Bayesian statistics and generative modeling. Consider the problem of sampling from the posterior distribution $P_{X|Y=y^*}$ for some observation $y^*$, where the likelihood $P_{Y|X}$ is known, and we are given $n$ i.i.d. samples $D=\{X_i\}_{i=1}^n$ drawn from an unknown prior distribution $π_X$. Suppose that $f(\hatπ_{X^n})$ is the distribution of a posterior sample generated by an algorithm (e.g. a conditional generative model or the Bayes rule) when $\hatπ_{X^n}$ is the empirical distribution of the training data. Although averaging over the randomness of the training data $D$, we have $\mathbb{E}_D\left(\hatπ_{X^n}\right)= π_X$, we do not have $\mathbb{E}_D\left\{f(\hatπ_{X^n})\right\}= f(π_X)$ due to the nonlinearity of $f$, leading to a bias. In this paper we propose a black-box debiasing scheme that improves the accuracy of such a naive plug-in approach. For any integer $k$ and under boundedness of the likelihood and smoothness of $f$, we generate samples $\hat{X}^{(1)},\dots,\hat{X}^{(k)}$ and weights $w_1,\dots,w_k$ such that $\sum_{i=1}^kw_iP_{\hat{X}^{(i)}}$ is a $k$-th order approximation of $f(π_X)$, where the generation process treats $f$ as a black-box. Our generation process achieves higher accuracy when averaged over the randomness of the training data, without degrading the variance, which can be interpreted as improving memorization without compromising generalization in generative models.

ArXiv.org
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.