A note on the distinct distances problem over finite fields

We study a finite-field analogue of the Erdős distinct distances problem under the Hamming metric. For a set \(S\subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^n\) let $Δ(S)$ denote the set of Hamming distances determined by \(S\). We prove the lower bound \[ |Δ(S)| \;\ge\; \frac{\log |S|}{2\log(2nq)}, \] and show this bound is tight when \(|S|=O(\text{poly}(n))\), where the constant of proportionality depends only on $q$. We then also study the problem of finding a large \emph{rainbow set}, that is, a subset \(S\subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^n\) for which all \(\binom{|S|}{2}\) pairwise Hamming distances spanned by $S$ are distinct. In contrast to the Euclidean setting, we show that a set with many distinct distances does not imply the existence of a large rainbow set, by giving an explicit construction. Nevertheless, we establish the existence of large rainbow sets, and prove that every large set in \(\mathbb{F}_q^n\) necessarily contains a non-trivial rainbow subset.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-10-13
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A note on the distinct distances problem over finite fields

ArXiv.org
Archaeological Research and Protection
article

A note on the distinct distances problem over finite fields

article en

Abstract

We study a finite-field analogue of the Erdős distinct distances problem under the Hamming metric. For a set \(S\subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^n\) let $Δ(S)$ denote the set of Hamming distances determined by \(S\). We prove the lower bound \[ |Δ(S)| \;\ge\; \frac{\log |S|}{2\log(2nq)}, \] and show this bound is tight when \(|S|=O(\text{poly}(n))\), where the constant of proportionality depends only on $q$. We then also study the problem of finding a large \emph{rainbow set}, that is, a subset \(S\subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^n\) for which all \(\binom{|S|}{2}\) pairwise Hamming distances spanned by $S$ are distinct. In contrast to the Euclidean setting, we show that a set with many distinct distances does not imply the existence of a large rainbow set, by giving an explicit construction. Nevertheless, we establish the existence of large rainbow sets, and prove that every large set in \(\mathbb{F}_q^n\) necessarily contains a non-trivial rainbow subset.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Archaeological Research and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.