Informal regulation of relations between state power and religion in the USSR: research methodology

Abstract:Introduction. The article defines the subject field, methodological approaches and methods of studying informal rules and practices typical for the sphere of regulation of state-religious relations in Russia (on the example of the Soviet period of national history). Modern studies of power regimes and models of legal regulation draw much attention to the issue, noting that informal rules and practices have a significant impact on formal norms, legal regulation and law enforcement practice. Methods. The authors describe the historiographical developments reflecting the national managerial model from the perspective of informality. The authors consider the possibility of using the methodological framework of Douglass North’s neo-institutional approach and Mary Douglas’s anthropological interpretation of institutional analysis in studying the sphere of religious institutions’ management. Thus, the authors propose an innovative interdisciplinary approach to the subject under consideration. Results. As a result, the authors’ vision of the subject, directions and methods of research in this area is proposed in consideration of the specifics of current historiography and available publications reflecting the peculiarities of Soviet informal practices of managing state-religious institutional interactions. The priority of verbal, personal orders and assignments over written instructions and directives is often considered to be one of the basic characteristics of the Soviet management model. In addition, the so-called “unwritten rules”, typical for the late Soviet model of legal regulation, are largely present in the modern situation of regulation of relations between the state and religious organisations. This proves the importance of studying the Soviet space of informal rules and practices in the religious sphere.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of the St Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-3-20-27
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informal regulation of relations between state power and religion in the USSR: research methodology

Vestnik of the St Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

Informal regulation of relations between state power and religion in the USSR: research methodology

article en

Abstract

Abstract:Introduction. The article defines the subject field, methodological approaches and methods of studying informal rules and practices typical for the sphere of regulation of state-religious relations in Russia (on the example of the Soviet period of national history). Modern studies of power regimes and models of legal regulation draw much attention to the issue, noting that informal rules and practices have a significant impact on formal norms, legal regulation and law enforcement practice. Methods. The authors describe the historiographical developments reflecting the national managerial model from the perspective of informality. The authors consider the possibility of using the methodological framework of Douglass North’s neo-institutional approach and Mary Douglas’s anthropological interpretation of institutional analysis in studying the sphere of religious institutions’ management. Thus, the authors propose an innovative interdisciplinary approach to the subject under consideration. Results. As a result, the authors’ vision of the subject, directions and methods of research in this area is proposed in consideration of the specifics of current historiography and available publications reflecting the peculiarities of Soviet informal practices of managing state-religious institutional interactions. The priority of verbal, personal orders and assignments over written instructions and directives is often considered to be one of the basic characteristics of the Soviet management model. In addition, the so-called “unwritten rules”, typical for the late Soviet model of legal regulation, are largely present in the modern situation of regulation of relations between the state and religious organisations. This proves the importance of studying the Soviet space of informal rules and practices in the religious sphere.

Vestnik of the St Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of RussiaVol. 2025(3)
Moscow State Pedagogical University (RU), Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.