A Study on the Development of Technology and the Legal Issues of Music Copyright

This study aims to analyze <legislative-policy-precedent> to narrow the <technology development-time difference between legislative policies> for artificial intelligence (AI) technology-based cover songs based on civil law rights capability and criminal courtism legal theory. The “Study on the Modes of Music Copyright by Technological Development,” which focuses on technological change and flexible operation of laws, can be seen as ensuring appropriateness in response to the urgent requests of the times that imitated the wise people who saw through the spirit of the times in the transition period from the Middle Ages to the modern era. Changes in existing precedents act to eliminate “simultaneous multiple risks caused by globalization” that prevent legislative gaps caused by “technology development-time difference between legislative policies”, so we intend to consider how non-human beings are entitled to their rights obligations and qualifications as subjects through various legal theories and national precedents and legislative directions, and suggest alternative measures. Inevitably, contradictions that are difficult to immediately accept, such as whether AI’ s rights and capabilities are recognized, contrary to the existing legal system, are found. In particular, creative acts, ‘author personality rights’, and ‘ creators’, which are ‘factual acts’, are rights arising from the fact that they are ‘natural people’, and most of the related laws are stipulated as mandatory regulations. It aims to protect human creative behavior by presenting alternative views to break down such legal contradictions, while preventing human technological unemployment and protecting existential values by strictly limiting the role of artificial intelligence (AI) as an auxiliary means. Through this, I would like to examine through various legal theories how non- human beings are entitled to their rights obligations and qualifications as subjects.

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Society of Gyobang and Culture
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58936/gcr.2025.9.5.3.273
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Development of Technology and the Legal Issues of Music Copyright

The Korean Society of Gyobang and Culture
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

A Study on the Development of Technology and the Legal Issues of Music Copyright

article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze <legislative-policy-precedent> to narrow the <technology development-time difference between legislative policies> for artificial intelligence (AI) technology-based cover songs based on civil law rights capability and criminal courtism legal theory. The “Study on the Modes of Music Copyright by Technological Development,” which focuses on technological change and flexible operation of laws, can be seen as ensuring appropriateness in response to the urgent requests of the times that imitated the wise people who saw through the spirit of the times in the transition period from the Middle Ages to the modern era. Changes in existing precedents act to eliminate “simultaneous multiple risks caused by globalization” that prevent legislative gaps caused by “technology development-time difference between legislative policies”, so we intend to consider how non-human beings are entitled to their rights obligations and qualifications as subjects through various legal theories and national precedents and legislative directions, and suggest alternative measures. Inevitably, contradictions that are difficult to immediately accept, such as whether AI’ s rights and capabilities are recognized, contrary to the existing legal system, are found. In particular, creative acts, ‘author personality rights’, and ‘ creators’, which are ‘factual acts’, are rights arising from the fact that they are ‘natural people’, and most of the related laws are stipulated as mandatory regulations. It aims to protect human creative behavior by presenting alternative views to break down such legal contradictions, while preventing human technological unemployment and protecting existential values by strictly limiting the role of artificial intelligence (AI) as an auxiliary means. Through this, I would like to examine through various legal theories how non- human beings are entitled to their rights obligations and qualifications as subjects.

The Korean Society of Gyobang and CultureVol. 5(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.