Comparative Study of Lignocaine Nebulization Versus Intravenous Lignocaine in Attenuating Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

Background and Aims: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are associated with marked sympathetic stimulation, resulting in transient hypertension and tachycardia. While lignocaine is widely used to blunt these responses, the relative efficacy of intravenous versus nebulized administration remains uncertain. This study compared intravenous and nebulized lignocaine for attenuation of pressor responses during elective intubation. Methods: In this randomized, single-blinded trial, 100 ASA I–II patients aged 18–55 years undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were allocated into two groups (n = 50 each). Group IL received intravenous lignocaine 2% (2 mg/kg) 90 seconds before intubation, while Group NL received nebulized lignocaine 2% (2 mg/kg) 10 minutes prior to induction. Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure) were recorded at baseline, at 1–5 minutes after intubation, and every 2 minutes up to 15 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Baseline demographic and hemodynamic variables were comparable between groups. Post-intubation, Group IL showed significantly attenuated rises in heart rate (mean 86.6 ± 7.4 vs. 100.0 ± 12.2 bpm at 3 min, p < 0.001), systolic pressure (138.9 ± 11.5 vs. 152.9 ± 12.2 mmHg at 1 min, p < 0.001), diastolic pressure (93.6 ± 8.2 vs. 102.5 ± 11.1 mmHg at 1 min, p < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (104.3 ± 9.7 vs. 119.3 ± 10.0 mmHg at 1 min, p < 0.001). Significant differences persisted until 5 minutes, after which values converged. No adverse events were observed in either group. Conclusion: Intravenous lignocaine 2 mg/kg given 90 seconds before intubation was more effective than nebulized lignocaine in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Nebulized lignocaine, though non-invasive, provided incomplete protection, particularly against peak surges in the first five minutes. Intravenous lignocaine remains the preferred method for routine elective intubations, while nebulized administration may be considered when intravenous use is not feasible

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17347046
Primary Topic
Legal Cases and Commentary
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Lignocaine Nebulization Versus Intravenous Lignocaine in Attenuating Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Cases and Commentary
article

Comparative Study of Lignocaine Nebulization Versus Intravenous Lignocaine in Attenuating Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are associated with marked sympathetic stimulation, resulting in transient hypertension and tachycardia. While lignocaine is widely used to blunt these responses, the relative efficacy of intravenous versus nebulized administration remains uncertain. This study compared intravenous and nebulized lignocaine for attenuation of pressor responses during elective intubation. Methods: In this randomized, single-blinded trial, 100 ASA I–II patients aged 18–55 years undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were allocated into two groups (n = 50 each). Group IL received intravenous lignocaine 2% (2 mg/kg) 90 seconds before intubation, while Group NL received nebulized lignocaine 2% (2 mg/kg) 10 minutes prior to induction. Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure) were recorded at baseline, at 1–5 minutes after intubation, and every 2 minutes up to 15 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Baseline demographic and hemodynamic variables were comparable between groups. Post-intubation, Group IL showed significantly attenuated rises in heart rate (mean 86.6 ± 7.4 vs. 100.0 ± 12.2 bpm at 3 min, p < 0.001), systolic pressure (138.9 ± 11.5 vs. 152.9 ± 12.2 mmHg at 1 min, p < 0.001), diastolic pressure (93.6 ± 8.2 vs. 102.5 ± 11.1 mmHg at 1 min, p < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (104.3 ± 9.7 vs. 119.3 ± 10.0 mmHg at 1 min, p < 0.001). Significant differences persisted until 5 minutes, after which values converged. No adverse events were observed in either group. Conclusion: Intravenous lignocaine 2 mg/kg given 90 seconds before intubation was more effective than nebulized lignocaine in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Nebulized lignocaine, though non-invasive, provided incomplete protection, particularly against peak surges in the first five minutes. Intravenous lignocaine remains the preferred method for routine elective intubations, while nebulized administration may be considered when intravenous use is not feasible

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Legal Cases and Commentary
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.