Blinded by Circularity: Ignoring Critical Limitations in the Quest for Sustainability – the Case of Operations and Supply Chain Management

This study critically examines the circular economy (CE) concept through two systematic literature reviews, conducted across general management and economics (28 articles) and operations and supply chain management (45 articles). The research addresses two key questions: how CE criticisms can be systematically categorised and how profoundly these criticisms are reflected in OSCM discussions. The analysis reveals six major criticism categories: conceptualisation, efficiency, implementation, regulation, product/process, and economic value. A critical finding shows that while OSCM literature acknowledges CE criticisms, only 20 % of publications move beyond superficial mentions to propose actionable solutions. The study challenges the prevailing utopian assumptions surrounding CE, revealing a disconnect between acknowledging limitations and addressing them in a meaningful way. The authors argue for interdisciplinary collaboration and deeper embedding of CE criticisms into research frameworks to develop realistic and implementable solutions rather than maintaining idealistic visions of circularity.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5771/0042-059x-2025-3-303
Primary Topic
American Environmental and Regional History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blinded by Circularity: Ignoring Critical Limitations in the Quest for Sustainability – the Case of Operations and Supply Chain Management

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
American Environmental and Regional History
article

Blinded by Circularity: Ignoring Critical Limitations in the Quest for Sustainability – the Case of Operations and Supply Chain Management

article en

Abstract

This study critically examines the circular economy (CE) concept through two systematic literature reviews, conducted across general management and economics (28 articles) and operations and supply chain management (45 articles). The research addresses two key questions: how CE criticisms can be systematically categorised and how profoundly these criticisms are reflected in OSCM discussions. The analysis reveals six major criticism categories: conceptualisation, efficiency, implementation, regulation, product/process, and economic value. A critical finding shows that while OSCM literature acknowledges CE criticisms, only 20 % of publications move beyond superficial mentions to propose actionable solutions. The study challenges the prevailing utopian assumptions surrounding CE, revealing a disconnect between acknowledging limitations and addressing them in a meaningful way. The authors argue for interdisciplinary collaboration and deeper embedding of CE criticisms into research frameworks to develop realistic and implementable solutions rather than maintaining idealistic visions of circularity.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
American Environmental and Regional History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blinded by Circularity: Ignoring Critical Limitations in the Quest for Sustainability – the Case of Operations and Supply Chain Management · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS