The Unity of Transcendence and Immanence in Schelling’s Theory of Art Production

Art in Schelling’s System of Transcendental Idealism is normally considered to be a direct and irrational leap from immanence to transcendence, liberating consciousness from the structure of differentiation to absolute identity. I challenge this view on two grounds. First, transcendence and immanence, or absolute identity and consciousness, are not mutually exclusive but intrinsically unified within the principle of productivity. Second, art is not a leap from one side to the other but a full enactment of productivity, thereby revealing the unity of immanence and transcendence—each affirming itself only through the other. In conclusion, Schelling redefines transcendence and immanence from the standpoint of productivity, diverging from common scholarly interpretations as well as the philosophies of Plotinus and Spinoza. The transcendent is the intrinsic vitality that drives the ceaseless generation and transformation of finite determinations in the immanent realm. In turn, immanence is the dynamic medium through which the transcendent actualizes its freedom and posits itself as a real transcendent.

Publication Details

Journal
Idealistic Studies
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies20251014192
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Unity of Transcendence and Immanence in Schelling’s Theory of Art Production

Idealistic Studies
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

The Unity of Transcendence and Immanence in Schelling’s Theory of Art Production

article en

Abstract

Art in Schelling’s System of Transcendental Idealism is normally considered to be a direct and irrational leap from immanence to transcendence, liberating consciousness from the structure of differentiation to absolute identity. I challenge this view on two grounds. First, transcendence and immanence, or absolute identity and consciousness, are not mutually exclusive but intrinsically unified within the principle of productivity. Second, art is not a leap from one side to the other but a full enactment of productivity, thereby revealing the unity of immanence and transcendence—each affirming itself only through the other. In conclusion, Schelling redefines transcendence and immanence from the standpoint of productivity, diverging from common scholarly interpretations as well as the philosophies of Plotinus and Spinoza. The transcendent is the intrinsic vitality that drives the ceaseless generation and transformation of finite determinations in the immanent realm. In turn, immanence is the dynamic medium through which the transcendent actualizes its freedom and posits itself as a real transcendent.

Idealistic StudiesVol. 56(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Unity of Transcendence and Immanence in Schelling’s Theory of Art Production · Idealistic Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS