Understanding Planning Support Systems Institutionalization in the Planning Process Through Actor–Network Theory: The Case of the Strategic Development Framework Methodology

Studies conceptualize planning support systems (PSS) outcomes as post-implementation use (limited or continuous) in the planning process. This paper presents another perspective on PSS implementation outcomes—its institutionalization in the planning process. It combines the sociology of translation (SoT) and actor–network theory (ANT) as an analytic framework to investigate and explain a country’s PSS institutionalization in the planning process over 8 years. Ethnographic methods aid qualitative data collection and analysis. Results provide insight in the following three ways: (1) how heterogeneous actors create networks for PSS use, (2) to what extent the network(s) shape PSS institutionalization, and (3) why PSS institutionalization in planning processes does or does not happen. This paper argues that if PSS research investigates and documents these three ways, it will provide additional insights into the decisions, actions, and agencies of PSS institutionalization compared to studies that conceptualize PSS outcomes with use. It contributes to PSS research and practice by demonstrating the value of ANT in enhancing our understanding of PSS institutionalization in planning processes. It recommends further studies to validate this research regarding both retrospective understanding of and prospective management for PSS institutionalization.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14100399
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Planning Support Systems Institutionalization in the Planning Process Through Actor–Network Theory: The Case of the Strategic Development Framework Methodology

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Understanding Planning Support Systems Institutionalization in the Planning Process Through Actor–Network Theory: The Case of the Strategic Development Framework Methodology

article en

Abstract

Studies conceptualize planning support systems (PSS) outcomes as post-implementation use (limited or continuous) in the planning process. This paper presents another perspective on PSS implementation outcomes—its institutionalization in the planning process. It combines the sociology of translation (SoT) and actor–network theory (ANT) as an analytic framework to investigate and explain a country’s PSS institutionalization in the planning process over 8 years. Ethnographic methods aid qualitative data collection and analysis. Results provide insight in the following three ways: (1) how heterogeneous actors create networks for PSS use, (2) to what extent the network(s) shape PSS institutionalization, and (3) why PSS institutionalization in planning processes does or does not happen. This paper argues that if PSS research investigates and documents these three ways, it will provide additional insights into the decisions, actions, and agencies of PSS institutionalization compared to studies that conceptualize PSS outcomes with use. It contributes to PSS research and practice by demonstrating the value of ANT in enhancing our understanding of PSS institutionalization in planning processes. It recommends further studies to validate this research regarding both retrospective understanding of and prospective management for PSS institutionalization.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 14(10)
University of Twente (NL)
University of Twente
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.