The Dual Nature of Stress at Work: A Challenge-Hindrance Framework Perspective

This study presents a systematic literature review of 27 peer-reviewed articles published between 2013 and 2023 to critically examine the relevance and adaptability of the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework (CHSF) in contemporary organizational settings. The findings reveal that while the CHSF continues to offer foundational insights into how workplace stressors influence employee outcomes, its dichotomous classification often fails to capture the contextual, perceptual, and dynamic complexities of real-world stress experiences. Factors such as leadership style, organizational justice, cultural norms, and digital transformation significantly mediate the appraisal and impact of stressors. Moreover, individual resilience and coping mechanisms emerged as crucial moderators that influence whether stressors are perceived as challenges or hindrances. The review calls for a reconceptualization of CHSF into a more integrative and fluid model that accommodates multidimensional stressor interactions and evolving work environments. This updated perspective provides a stronger theoretical and practical foundation for future research and organizational interventions aimed at improving employee well-being and performance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Escalate Economics and Business Journal
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61536/escalate.v3i01.287
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dual Nature of Stress at Work: A Challenge-Hindrance Framework Perspective

Escalate Economics and Business Journal
Resilience and Mental Health
article

The Dual Nature of Stress at Work: A Challenge-Hindrance Framework Perspective

article en

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review of 27 peer-reviewed articles published between 2013 and 2023 to critically examine the relevance and adaptability of the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework (CHSF) in contemporary organizational settings. The findings reveal that while the CHSF continues to offer foundational insights into how workplace stressors influence employee outcomes, its dichotomous classification often fails to capture the contextual, perceptual, and dynamic complexities of real-world stress experiences. Factors such as leadership style, organizational justice, cultural norms, and digital transformation significantly mediate the appraisal and impact of stressors. Moreover, individual resilience and coping mechanisms emerged as crucial moderators that influence whether stressors are perceived as challenges or hindrances. The review calls for a reconceptualization of CHSF into a more integrative and fluid model that accommodates multidimensional stressor interactions and evolving work environments. This updated perspective provides a stronger theoretical and practical foundation for future research and organizational interventions aimed at improving employee well-being and performance.

Escalate Economics and Business JournalVol. 3(01)
Universitas Nusa Bangsa (ID), Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Kalbe (ID), Universitas Pelita Bangsa
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.