Conceptual Framework of a DEA-Driven Decision Support System for Pandemic Response

This paper presents a conceptual framework for assessing the effectiveness of pandemic response measures using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a decision support tool. The proposed model integrates both discretionary and non-discretionary inputs, as well as desirable and undesirable outputs – extending the classical DEA approach to better reflect the complexity of public health systems in crisis contexts. The paper highlights the methodological advantages of this approach, including its ability to identify efficiency benchmarks and recommend targeted improvements. However, the analysis also underscores a major limitation: the lack of standardized and reliable data across countries significantly undermines the model’s applicability and interpretability. The authors conclude that without international harmonization of health data reporting practices, even the most advanced evaluation models cannot yield credible or actionable insights for pandemic management.

Publication Details

Journal
Communications of International Proceedings
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5171/2025.4537525
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual Framework of a DEA-Driven Decision Support System for Pandemic Response

Communications of International Proceedings
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Conceptual Framework of a DEA-Driven Decision Support System for Pandemic Response

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework for assessing the effectiveness of pandemic response measures using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a decision support tool. The proposed model integrates both discretionary and non-discretionary inputs, as well as desirable and undesirable outputs – extending the classical DEA approach to better reflect the complexity of public health systems in crisis contexts. The paper highlights the methodological advantages of this approach, including its ability to identify efficiency benchmarks and recommend targeted improvements. However, the analysis also underscores a major limitation: the lack of standardized and reliable data across countries significantly undermines the model’s applicability and interpretability. The authors conclude that without international harmonization of health data reporting practices, even the most advanced evaluation models cannot yield credible or actionable insights for pandemic management.

Communications of International Proceedings
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.