Formation of resilience of enterprises as economic systems in conditions of instability of the economic environment: conceptual basis

Methods. The study is based on the use of system analysis, as well as methods of scientific abstraction (when considering the essence of the concept of «resilience of economic systems»). The levels of resilience manifestation are structured using the classification method. The general and specific method allowed us to determine specific types of enterprise resilience. Results. The article provides a comprehensive analysis of conceptual approaches to understanding the resilience of economic systems as a key indicator of their stability, flexibility and ability to adapt in the face of global challenges and high uncertainty. The authors note that modern economic science increasingly considers resilience not only as the ability of a system to recover from negative impacts, but also as a dynamic process of transformation that ensures the preservation of functionality and development in new exogenous conditions. As a result of the study, two main approaches to the interpretation of resilience were identified. The first, engineering (mechanistic) one, is focused on the rapid return of the system to the initial equilibrium point after shock events, where the main criterion is the ability to restitution. The second one is an adaptive (evolutionary) approach that emphasizes the role of structural changes, innovations and flexibility as a response to external stressors, which allows the system not only to recover, but also to restructure in accordance with new challenges. Novelty. The author of the article substantiates the need to synthesize these approaches within the framework of an integrated resilience model, where the process of initial balance restoration is combined with further adaptation and innovative system renewal. The author's definition of resilience is proposed, which defines it as a multifaceted characteristic of an economic system that manifests itself at different levels: mega (macrosystem), meso (organizational-regional level), micro (subsystems and individual enterprises) and individual level (personnel and individual agents). The article also structures the levels of resilience manifestation, determines the specific types of resilience that correspond to them, in particular, national, regional, organizational and personal resilience. The emphasis is on the principles of effective resilience management, which are based on proactivity, interdisciplinarity, systematicity and strategic flexibility. Practical value. The results obtained can become a methodological basis for the formation of policies to increase the resilience of economic systems, as well as the development of adaptive strategies for the development of enterprises, regions and states in the post-crisis period, contributing to strengthening their competitiveness and resilience to future challenges.

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of Technology
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/91.188
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formation of resilience of enterprises as economic systems in conditions of instability of the economic environment: conceptual basis

Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of Technology
Regional resilience and development
article

Formation of resilience of enterprises as economic systems in conditions of instability of the economic environment: conceptual basis

article en

Abstract

Methods. The study is based on the use of system analysis, as well as methods of scientific abstraction (when considering the essence of the concept of «resilience of economic systems»). The levels of resilience manifestation are structured using the classification method. The general and specific method allowed us to determine specific types of enterprise resilience. Results. The article provides a comprehensive analysis of conceptual approaches to understanding the resilience of economic systems as a key indicator of their stability, flexibility and ability to adapt in the face of global challenges and high uncertainty. The authors note that modern economic science increasingly considers resilience not only as the ability of a system to recover from negative impacts, but also as a dynamic process of transformation that ensures the preservation of functionality and development in new exogenous conditions. As a result of the study, two main approaches to the interpretation of resilience were identified. The first, engineering (mechanistic) one, is focused on the rapid return of the system to the initial equilibrium point after shock events, where the main criterion is the ability to restitution. The second one is an adaptive (evolutionary) approach that emphasizes the role of structural changes, innovations and flexibility as a response to external stressors, which allows the system not only to recover, but also to restructure in accordance with new challenges. Novelty. The author of the article substantiates the need to synthesize these approaches within the framework of an integrated resilience model, where the process of initial balance restoration is combined with further adaptation and innovative system renewal. The author's definition of resilience is proposed, which defines it as a multifaceted characteristic of an economic system that manifests itself at different levels: mega (macrosystem), meso (organizational-regional level), micro (subsystems and individual enterprises) and individual level (personnel and individual agents). The article also structures the levels of resilience manifestation, determines the specific types of resilience that correspond to them, in particular, national, regional, organizational and personal resilience. The emphasis is on the principles of effective resilience management, which are based on proactivity, interdisciplinarity, systematicity and strategic flexibility. Practical value. The results obtained can become a methodological basis for the formation of policies to increase the resilience of economic systems, as well as the development of adaptive strategies for the development of enterprises, regions and states in the post-crisis period, contributing to strengthening their competitiveness and resilience to future challenges.

Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of TechnologyVol. 91
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Regional resilience and development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.