Application of cryptofinancial instruments for the development of inclusive tourism: an empirical analysis

Methods. An interdisciplinary approach was used, combining cryptocurrencies, blockchain, decentralized governance, and research into ways of financing the development of inclusive tourism infrastructure in Ukraine. A comparative analysis method (case study) was used to study historical precedents for the use of cryptocurrency and blockchain tools to finance socially beneficial projects, benchmarking to systematize and objectively compare the projects under consideration, and a quantitative analysis method to identify key success factors and reveal the antagonism between donor compensation and social return. Results. An analytical framework and scoring system based on six criteria (compensation, accountability, governance, efficiency, effectiveness, tokenomics) were developed. Empirical analysis revealed a key antagonism: there is a negative correlation between projects that offer donors tangible value in exchange for their contributions and those that achieve real socially beneficial results. However, some of the projects considered deviate from this pattern. The Klima DAO project demonstrates a positive precedent for tokenizing a valuable asset and providing both value from token usage and the ability to make contributions that are closer in nature to traditional irrevocable donations. The Gitcoin project demonstrates a precedent for separating donor participants and administrator participants, whose activities are regulated through DAOs and smart contracts. Based on the empirical analysis, recommendations are made for the implementation of socially useful projects using crypto tools, in particular: ensuring the transparency of value flows; decentralizing governance by including stakeholders, for whose benefit the project is being implemented, in decision-making processes; ensuring endogenous value flows that can support the long-term success of the project. Novelty. A system for evaluating and comparing cryptocurrency and blockchain projects in the context of their use for financing projects aimed at achieving socially useful goals has been developed. An antagonism between donor compensation and the achievement of stated goals has been identified, and ways to mitigate this antagonism and promote the emergent effects have been suggested. Practical value. The recommendations developed can be applied in organizing financing for projects aimed at developing inclusive tourism infrastructure in Ukraine using cryptocurrency and blockchain tools.

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of Technology
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/91.020
Primary Topic
Sharing Economy and Platforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of cryptofinancial instruments for the development of inclusive tourism: an empirical analysis

Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of Technology
Sharing Economy and Platforms
article

Application of cryptofinancial instruments for the development of inclusive tourism: an empirical analysis

article en

Abstract

Methods. An interdisciplinary approach was used, combining cryptocurrencies, blockchain, decentralized governance, and research into ways of financing the development of inclusive tourism infrastructure in Ukraine. A comparative analysis method (case study) was used to study historical precedents for the use of cryptocurrency and blockchain tools to finance socially beneficial projects, benchmarking to systematize and objectively compare the projects under consideration, and a quantitative analysis method to identify key success factors and reveal the antagonism between donor compensation and social return. Results. An analytical framework and scoring system based on six criteria (compensation, accountability, governance, efficiency, effectiveness, tokenomics) were developed. Empirical analysis revealed a key antagonism: there is a negative correlation between projects that offer donors tangible value in exchange for their contributions and those that achieve real socially beneficial results. However, some of the projects considered deviate from this pattern. The Klima DAO project demonstrates a positive precedent for tokenizing a valuable asset and providing both value from token usage and the ability to make contributions that are closer in nature to traditional irrevocable donations. The Gitcoin project demonstrates a precedent for separating donor participants and administrator participants, whose activities are regulated through DAOs and smart contracts. Based on the empirical analysis, recommendations are made for the implementation of socially useful projects using crypto tools, in particular: ensuring the transparency of value flows; decentralizing governance by including stakeholders, for whose benefit the project is being implemented, in decision-making processes; ensuring endogenous value flows that can support the long-term success of the project. Novelty. A system for evaluating and comparing cryptocurrency and blockchain projects in the context of their use for financing projects aimed at achieving socially useful goals has been developed. An antagonism between donor compensation and the achievement of stated goals has been identified, and ways to mitigate this antagonism and promote the emergent effects have been suggested. Practical value. The recommendations developed can be applied in organizing financing for projects aimed at developing inclusive tourism infrastructure in Ukraine using cryptocurrency and blockchain tools.

Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of TechnologyVol. 91
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Sharing Economy and Platforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.