Factors influencing the development of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients after ileostomy reversal

Abstract Objective To investigate the influencing factors for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) at one year after ileostomy reversal in patients who have undergone radical resection for rectal cancer, and to inform clinical interventions. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 312 patients who successfully underwent ileostomy reversal after radical resection for rectal cancer between January 2023 and January 2024 at 3 tertiary hospitals in Chongqing. Based on LARS scores at 1-year after stoma reversal, they were divided into a LARS group (score ≥21) and a non-LARS group (score≤20). Clinical data were collected from the medical record system, including age, body mass index (BMI), sex, tumor size, tumor distance from the anal verge, T stage, N stage, date of low anterior resection, neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative chemotherapy, anastomotic leakage, and date of ileostomy reversal. Univariate analysis was used to screen potential influencing factors, and variables with P<0.2 were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Binary stepwise regression analysis was applied to further analyze significant influencing factors for LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal. Results In the cohort, there were 127 patients assigned into the LARS group and 185 into the non-LARS group. The incidence of LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal was 40.70%, with mild cases accounting for 21.79% and severe ones for 18.91%, and a mean LARS score of 14.52±11.64. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy (yes vs no: OR=1.830, 95%CI: 1.088~3.089; P=0.023), tumor distance from anal verge ≤5 cm (vs >5 cm: OR=2.044, 95%CI:1.249~3.374; P=0.005), occurrence of anastomotic leakage (yes vs no: OR=7.470, 95%CI: 2.247~34.102; P=0.003), time to reversal (≥181 d vs 91~180 d: OR=2.297, 95%CI:1.363~3.917; P=0.002), and N stage (N1~N2 vs N0: OR=1.650, 95%CI: 1.009~2.717; P=0.047) were significant influencing factors for LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal. Conclusion Our results suggest that anastomotic leakage, time to reversal ≥181 d, tumor distance from anal verge ≤5 cm, neoadjuvant therapy, and N stage N1~N2 are associated with the occurrence of LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal in patients following radical resection of rectal cancer. Clinical healthcare providers should implement early intervention and long-term follow-up for patients with high-risk factors both before and after stoma reversal.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202508027
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing the development of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients after ileostomy reversal

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Factors influencing the development of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients after ileostomy reversal

article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To investigate the influencing factors for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) at one year after ileostomy reversal in patients who have undergone radical resection for rectal cancer, and to inform clinical interventions. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 312 patients who successfully underwent ileostomy reversal after radical resection for rectal cancer between January 2023 and January 2024 at 3 tertiary hospitals in Chongqing. Based on LARS scores at 1-year after stoma reversal, they were divided into a LARS group (score ≥21) and a non-LARS group (score≤20). Clinical data were collected from the medical record system, including age, body mass index (BMI), sex, tumor size, tumor distance from the anal verge, T stage, N stage, date of low anterior resection, neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative chemotherapy, anastomotic leakage, and date of ileostomy reversal. Univariate analysis was used to screen potential influencing factors, and variables with P<0.2 were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Binary stepwise regression analysis was applied to further analyze significant influencing factors for LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal. Results In the cohort, there were 127 patients assigned into the LARS group and 185 into the non-LARS group. The incidence of LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal was 40.70%, with mild cases accounting for 21.79% and severe ones for 18.91%, and a mean LARS score of 14.52±11.64. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy (yes vs no: OR=1.830, 95%CI: 1.088~3.089; P=0.023), tumor distance from anal verge ≤5 cm (vs >5 cm: OR=2.044, 95%CI:1.249~3.374; P=0.005), occurrence of anastomotic leakage (yes vs no: OR=7.470, 95%CI: 2.247~34.102; P=0.003), time to reversal (≥181 d vs 91~180 d: OR=2.297, 95%CI:1.363~3.917; P=0.002), and N stage (N1~N2 vs N0: OR=1.650, 95%CI: 1.009~2.717; P=0.047) were significant influencing factors for LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal. Conclusion Our results suggest that anastomotic leakage, time to reversal ≥181 d, tumor distance from anal verge ≤5 cm, neoadjuvant therapy, and N stage N1~N2 are associated with the occurrence of LARS at 1 year after ileostomy reversal in patients following radical resection of rectal cancer. Clinical healthcare providers should implement early intervention and long-term follow-up for patients with high-risk factors both before and after stoma reversal.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.