Upcoming Exploring the Impact of Required Justifications in Multiple-Choice Elaboration Questions on Student Experiences and Performance

Assessment can be a balance between practicality and authenticity. Assessments that are authentic and engaging (projects, papers) can be challenging to create and grade, whereas assessments that are quick (traditional test formats) can be too narrow in scope and don’t always showcase the depth of student learning. The present work investigated a blended approach – multiple-choice questions with elaboration (MCEQ). MCEQs require students to justify their answers to multiple-choice questions. Across 4 sections of an upper division Psychology Research Methods course at a large open-enrollment, public institution in the US, students took quizzes that contained both traditional multiple-choice and MCE questions and evaluated their experience with the two assessment types. Results showed that students had better performance on MCE questions and evaluated them as better assessments of their learning. I suggest that teachers who want a relatively quick form of assessment that challenges students to create explanations should consider the use of MCEQs considering elements that may impact student experience.

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upcoming Exploring the Impact of Required Justifications in Multiple-Choice Elaboration Questions on Student Experiences and Performance

Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
article

Upcoming Exploring the Impact of Required Justifications in Multiple-Choice Elaboration Questions on Student Experiences and Performance

article en

Abstract

Assessment can be a balance between practicality and authenticity. Assessments that are authentic and engaging (projects, papers) can be challenging to create and grade, whereas assessments that are quick (traditional test formats) can be too narrow in scope and don’t always showcase the depth of student learning. The present work investigated a blended approach – multiple-choice questions with elaboration (MCEQ). MCEQs require students to justify their answers to multiple-choice questions. Across 4 sections of an upper division Psychology Research Methods course at a large open-enrollment, public institution in the US, students took quizzes that contained both traditional multiple-choice and MCE questions and evaluated their experience with the two assessment types. Results showed that students had better performance on MCE questions and evaluated them as better assessments of their learning. I suggest that teachers who want a relatively quick form of assessment that challenges students to create explanations should consider the use of MCEQs considering elements that may impact student experience.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Upcoming Exploring the Impact of Required Justifications in Multiple-Choice Elaboration Questions on Student Experiences and Performance · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS