Comparison of Opioid Consumption During Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) Guided By Nociception Level Index (NOL) or Standard Care Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Surgery

Muhammet Esat Demirel,1,* Hulya Bilgin,2,* Selcan Akesen2 1Department of Anesthesiology, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Türkiye*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Muhammet Esat Demirel, Email [email protected]: This prospective, randomized controlled study aims to compare opioid doses in patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery managed with Total Intravenous Anesthesia using Target Controlled Infusion (TIVA-TCI) combined with Nociception Level (NOL) monitoring. The NOL index, an artificial intelligence–driven multiparameter index, integrates physiological signals such as heart rate, skin conductance, and photoplethysmography to provide an objective measure of nociception and guide personalized opioid administration. Additionally, the study evaluates the consumption of hypnotic drugs, hemodynamic parameters, variability in the NOL index, and changes in Heart Rate (HR) in the study group patients who received NOL monitoring following severe noxious stimuli.Patients and Methods: The study involved 50 ASA II–III patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery, with 25 in the standard care guided group and 25 in the NOL guided group. The control group received standard monitoring while NOL monitoring added in the study group. Propofol and remifentanil were titrated to maintain hemodynamic parameters or NOL values. Hemodynamic parameters, propofol and remifentanil doses were recorded and compared between groups. NOL index changes before and after noxious stimuli were compared with HR changes.Results: No significant differences were found in demographic data between the two groups. The remifentanil dose administered was similar in both groups. The study group received a higher dose of propofol. However, the control group had a longer duration of operation. The NOL index showed a significantly higher change after severe noxious stimuli compared to Heart Rate, indicating greater sensitivity.Conclusion: This study compares NOL index monitoring to standard monitoring during intracranial tumor surgery. The results indicate that NOL monitoring is reliable in detecting and monitoring nociception events compared to heart rate changes. However, it does not lead to a significant reduction in opioid dose administration.Keywords: target controlled infusion, intracranial tumor surgery, intraoperative nociception monitoring, NOL index monitoring, opioid

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Opioid Consumption During Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) Guided By Nociception Level Index (NOL) or Standard Care Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Surgery

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Comparison of Opioid Consumption During Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) Guided By Nociception Level Index (NOL) or Standard Care Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Surgery

article en

Abstract

Muhammet Esat Demirel,1,* Hulya Bilgin,2,* Selcan Akesen2 1Department of Anesthesiology, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Türkiye*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Muhammet Esat Demirel, Email [email protected]: This prospective, randomized controlled study aims to compare opioid doses in patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery managed with Total Intravenous Anesthesia using Target Controlled Infusion (TIVA-TCI) combined with Nociception Level (NOL) monitoring. The NOL index, an artificial intelligence–driven multiparameter index, integrates physiological signals such as heart rate, skin conductance, and photoplethysmography to provide an objective measure of nociception and guide personalized opioid administration. Additionally, the study evaluates the consumption of hypnotic drugs, hemodynamic parameters, variability in the NOL index, and changes in Heart Rate (HR) in the study group patients who received NOL monitoring following severe noxious stimuli.Patients and Methods: The study involved 50 ASA II–III patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery, with 25 in the standard care guided group and 25 in the NOL guided group. The control group received standard monitoring while NOL monitoring added in the study group. Propofol and remifentanil were titrated to maintain hemodynamic parameters or NOL values. Hemodynamic parameters, propofol and remifentanil doses were recorded and compared between groups. NOL index changes before and after noxious stimuli were compared with HR changes.Results: No significant differences were found in demographic data between the two groups. The remifentanil dose administered was similar in both groups. The study group received a higher dose of propofol. However, the control group had a longer duration of operation. The NOL index showed a significantly higher change after severe noxious stimuli compared to Heart Rate, indicating greater sensitivity.Conclusion: This study compares NOL index monitoring to standard monitoring during intracranial tumor surgery. The results indicate that NOL monitoring is reliable in detecting and monitoring nociception events compared to heart rate changes. However, it does not lead to a significant reduction in opioid dose administration.Keywords: target controlled infusion, intracranial tumor surgery, intraoperative nociception monitoring, NOL index monitoring, opioid

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.