Women’s Perspectives on Vocalization in the First and Second Stages of Labor: A Qualitative Study

Despite growing interest in humanized childbirth practices, there is still little qualitative research exploring women’s perspectives on vocalization during labor. The present study aims to analyze women’s experiences with the use of vocalization in the first and second stages of labor. A descriptive and exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 16 women in the postpartum period between February and April 2024. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling, and data saturation was achieved when no new themes emerged from the interviews. Thematic analysis was performed using IRaMuTeQ (version 0.8 alpha 7) software. The textual corpus generated allowed classification into five thematic categories: Vocalization as an instinctive expression in natural childbirth; Functionality of vocalization during labor; Medicalized childbirth and natural childbirth; Fears during childbirth and their contributing factors; Typology of vocalization in labor. We conclude that many women reported that vocalization during labor is instinctive and functional, providing pain relief, but also serving as a means of communication, empowering women. Its expression can be strongly influenced by sociocultural, emotional, and contextual factors in each woman’s particular sphere. These findings, although limited to a specific population, suggest that healthcare professionals should consider vocalization as an individualized support tool, taking cultural differences into account.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/women5040038
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women’s Perspectives on Vocalization in the First and Second Stages of Labor: A Qualitative Study

Women
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Women’s Perspectives on Vocalization in the First and Second Stages of Labor: A Qualitative Study

article en

Abstract

Despite growing interest in humanized childbirth practices, there is still little qualitative research exploring women’s perspectives on vocalization during labor. The present study aims to analyze women’s experiences with the use of vocalization in the first and second stages of labor. A descriptive and exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 16 women in the postpartum period between February and April 2024. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling, and data saturation was achieved when no new themes emerged from the interviews. Thematic analysis was performed using IRaMuTeQ (version 0.8 alpha 7) software. The textual corpus generated allowed classification into five thematic categories: Vocalization as an instinctive expression in natural childbirth; Functionality of vocalization during labor; Medicalized childbirth and natural childbirth; Fears during childbirth and their contributing factors; Typology of vocalization in labor. We conclude that many women reported that vocalization during labor is instinctive and functional, providing pain relief, but also serving as a means of communication, empowering women. Its expression can be strongly influenced by sociocultural, emotional, and contextual factors in each woman’s particular sphere. These findings, although limited to a specific population, suggest that healthcare professionals should consider vocalization as an individualized support tool, taking cultural differences into account.

WomenVol. 5(4)
University of Évora (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Portalegre (PT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.