Tightening inequalities on volume‐extremal k‐ellipsoids using asymmetry measures

Abstract We consider two well‐known problems: upper bounding the volume of lower dimensional ellipsoids contained in convex bodies given their John ellipsoid, and lower bounding the volume of ellipsoids containing projections of convex bodies given their Loewner ellipsoid. For the first problem, we use the John asymmetry to unify a tight upper bound for the general case by Ball with a stronger inequality for symmetric convex bodies. We obtain an inequality that is tight for most asymmetry values in large dimensions and an even stronger inequality in the planar case that is always best possible. In contrast, we show for the second problem an inequality that is tight for bodies of any asymmetry, including cross‐polytopes, parallelotopes, and (in almost all cases) simplices. Finally, we derive some consequences for the width‐circumradius‐ and diameter‐inradius‐ratios when optimized over affine transformations and show connections to the Banach–Mazur distance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematika
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1112/mtk.70051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Point processes and geometric inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tightening inequalities on volume‐extremal k‐ellipsoids using asymmetry measures

1 citations
Mathematika
Point processes and geometric inequalities
3.73
article

Tightening inequalities on volume‐extremal k‐ellipsoids using asymmetry measures

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We consider two well‐known problems: upper bounding the volume of lower dimensional ellipsoids contained in convex bodies given their John ellipsoid, and lower bounding the volume of ellipsoids containing projections of convex bodies given their Loewner ellipsoid. For the first problem, we use the John asymmetry to unify a tight upper bound for the general case by Ball with a stronger inequality for symmetric convex bodies. We obtain an inequality that is tight for most asymmetry values in large dimensions and an even stronger inequality in the planar case that is always best possible. In contrast, we show for the second problem an inequality that is tight for bodies of any asymmetry, including cross‐polytopes, parallelotopes, and (in almost all cases) simplices. Finally, we derive some consequences for the width‐circumradius‐ and diameter‐inradius‐ratios when optimized over affine transformations and show connections to the Banach–Mazur distance.

MathematikaVol. 71(4)
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Point processes and geometric inequalities
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tightening inequalities on volume‐extremal k‐ellipsoids using asymmetry measures · Mathematika (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS