Exploring acceptance of a Clinical Workflow tool in the Swedish Prosthetics and Orthotics Sector: A Qualitative Study (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The global demand for assistive devices (AD), such as prosthetics and orthotics, is increasing. However, a shortage of trained professionals contributes to suboptimal care. To improve clinical workflows, the Life Lounge Clinical Workflow (LLCW) has been developed. Understanding user acceptance is essential for ensuring its successful implementation. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study explored prosthetics and orthotics (P&amp;O) professionals’ perceptions and acceptance of LLCW, as well as the perceived benefits and challenges associated with its use. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> A qualitative study was conducted using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. The study included 18 P&amp;O professionals working at orthotic and prosthetic clinics across Sweden. After an interactive session about LLCW, feedback was collected via questionnaires. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Key factors influencing acceptance included Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Facilitating Conditions. Participants rated the platform highly in terms of ease of use (mean = 4.1) and motivation to use (mean = 4.6), suggesting that LLCW was perceived as intuitive and personally valuable. Management encouragement received the highest rating (mean = 4.8), highlighting the importance of organizational support. However, colleagues’ perceptions scored lower (mean = 2.7), indicating limited peer influence. Areas for improvement included greater patient involvement, structured onboarding or training, and more robust technical support. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Prosthetics and orthotics professionals reported generally positive experiences with LLCW, particularly regarding usability and performance. However, successful implementation requires integration into existing clinical workflows and attention to training and patient engagement. Addressing these elements can support broader adoption and contribute to digital transformation in P&amp;O care. </sec>

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.82584
Primary Topic
Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring acceptance of a Clinical Workflow tool in the Swedish Prosthetics and Orthotics Sector: A Qualitative Study (Preprint)

Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
article

Exploring acceptance of a Clinical Workflow tool in the Swedish Prosthetics and Orthotics Sector: A Qualitative Study (Preprint)

article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The global demand for assistive devices (AD), such as prosthetics and orthotics, is increasing. However, a shortage of trained professionals contributes to suboptimal care. To improve clinical workflows, the Life Lounge Clinical Workflow (LLCW) has been developed. Understanding user acceptance is essential for ensuring its successful implementation. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study explored prosthetics and orthotics (P&amp;O) professionals’ perceptions and acceptance of LLCW, as well as the perceived benefits and challenges associated with its use. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> A qualitative study was conducted using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. The study included 18 P&amp;O professionals working at orthotic and prosthetic clinics across Sweden. After an interactive session about LLCW, feedback was collected via questionnaires. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Key factors influencing acceptance included Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Facilitating Conditions. Participants rated the platform highly in terms of ease of use (mean = 4.1) and motivation to use (mean = 4.6), suggesting that LLCW was perceived as intuitive and personally valuable. Management encouragement received the highest rating (mean = 4.8), highlighting the importance of organizational support. However, colleagues’ perceptions scored lower (mean = 2.7), indicating limited peer influence. Areas for improvement included greater patient involvement, structured onboarding or training, and more robust technical support. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Prosthetics and orthotics professionals reported generally positive experiences with LLCW, particularly regarding usability and performance. However, successful implementation requires integration into existing clinical workflows and attention to training and patient engagement. Addressing these elements can support broader adoption and contribute to digital transformation in P&amp;O care. </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring acceptance of a Clinical Workflow tool in the Swedish Prosthetics and Orthotics Sector: A Qualitative Study (Preprint) · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS