Approaches for integrating sustainable development concepts into early childhood curricula: Paradoxes of theory and practice

Though many educational discourses stress the significance of involving children as active participants in promoting sustainability, sustainable development may initially seem like a complicated and abstract concept for young learners. The purpose of this study is to identify the contradictions between theoretical ideals and real classroom practices, as well as to investigate useful strategies for incorporating sustainable development concepts into early childhood curricula. In all, 384 female early childhood educators from kindergarten through third grade in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan took part in the study. The study found five paired strategies for incorporating sustainability into early learning using a descriptive-analytical methodology: Narrative-based vs. experiential/practical activities, direct instruction vs. project-based learning, individualized learning vs. group or collaborative learning, indoor classroom activities vs. outdoor/nature-based activities, and conventional/traditional vs. digitally enriched activities. Both structured and open-ended questions were used to gather the opinions of the teachers. The first set in each pair-narrative, direct, individualized, indoor, and traditional activities-was clearly preferred by participants over its more progressive counterparts, which included experiential, project-based, collaborative, outdoor, and digital activities, according to the results. Despite their strong support for incorporating sustainable development concepts into early childhood activities, the teachers' answers highlighted a fundamental paradox: The sophisticated and useful application of these concepts frequently surpasses their present level of expertise and day-to-day work. Many educators have questioned whether young children are developmentally ready to understand complex concepts related to sustainability, like social responsibility, environmental justice, and the green economy. They therefore tended to prefer easier, more recognizable instructional techniques-like storytelling, direct instruction, and regular classroom assignments-instead of hands-on, group, or tech-based learning. Teachers also identified a number of barriers, such as a lack of specialized training, a lack of curriculum materials that are age-appropriate, and a lack of institutional emphasis on sustainability in early childhood education.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sustainable Development Research
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/17279
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approaches for integrating sustainable development concepts into early childhood curricula: Paradoxes of theory and practice

European Journal of Sustainable Development Research
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Approaches for integrating sustainable development concepts into early childhood curricula: Paradoxes of theory and practice

article en

Abstract

Though many educational discourses stress the significance of involving children as active participants in promoting sustainability, sustainable development may initially seem like a complicated and abstract concept for young learners. The purpose of this study is to identify the contradictions between theoretical ideals and real classroom practices, as well as to investigate useful strategies for incorporating sustainable development concepts into early childhood curricula. In all, 384 female early childhood educators from kindergarten through third grade in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan took part in the study. The study found five paired strategies for incorporating sustainability into early learning using a descriptive-analytical methodology: Narrative-based vs. experiential/practical activities, direct instruction vs. project-based learning, individualized learning vs. group or collaborative learning, indoor classroom activities vs. outdoor/nature-based activities, and conventional/traditional vs. digitally enriched activities. Both structured and open-ended questions were used to gather the opinions of the teachers. The first set in each pair-narrative, direct, individualized, indoor, and traditional activities-was clearly preferred by participants over its more progressive counterparts, which included experiential, project-based, collaborative, outdoor, and digital activities, according to the results. Despite their strong support for incorporating sustainable development concepts into early childhood activities, the teachers' answers highlighted a fundamental paradox: The sophisticated and useful application of these concepts frequently surpasses their present level of expertise and day-to-day work. Many educators have questioned whether young children are developmentally ready to understand complex concepts related to sustainability, like social responsibility, environmental justice, and the green economy. They therefore tended to prefer easier, more recognizable instructional techniques-like storytelling, direct instruction, and regular classroom assignments-instead of hands-on, group, or tech-based learning. Teachers also identified a number of barriers, such as a lack of specialized training, a lack of curriculum materials that are age-appropriate, and a lack of institutional emphasis on sustainability in early childhood education.

European Journal of Sustainable Development ResearchVol. 10(1)
King Faisal University (SA), Sultan Qaboos University (OM), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
King Faisal University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.