Frontier Extractivism: Climate Change and Indigenous Dispossession

This article adopts the concept of frontier encounters to explore the continuities between extractivism as a phenomenon characterising the immediate colonial phase in Australia following assertion of British sovereignty, and a contemporary energy resource extraction frontier in the Northern Territory. Drawing on the wider historical context whereby various capitalist forms of extraction have precipitated the imperial transposition of colonial governance into the land and waters occupied by Indigenous peoples, it 'reads in' the dispossession of Aboriginal Peoples as integral to the trajectories of resource exploitation in Australia. Through a retrospective reading of Mabo v Queensland [No 2], it demonstrates how the colonial imposition of sovereign title over resources has provided the underlying legal property form, including the derivate native title regime, that bridges colonial dispossession and Australia's continuing contribution to climate change via export of carbon resources. In articulating the interlinkages between the two phases of frontier encounter, the article challenges the designation of the Anthropocene as an explanatory rationale. It suggests that the underlying knowledge and legal system supporting the Anthropocene are part of an ideology and set of scientific practices that are entwined with the histories and legacies of colonialism and imperialism, as well as the shifting parameters of capitalism across time.

Publication Details

Journal
Law/text/culture
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14453/ltc.1715
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frontier Extractivism: Climate Change and Indigenous Dispossession

Law/text/culture
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Frontier Extractivism: Climate Change and Indigenous Dispossession

article en

Abstract

This article adopts the concept of frontier encounters to explore the continuities between extractivism as a phenomenon characterising the immediate colonial phase in Australia following assertion of British sovereignty, and a contemporary energy resource extraction frontier in the Northern Territory. Drawing on the wider historical context whereby various capitalist forms of extraction have precipitated the imperial transposition of colonial governance into the land and waters occupied by Indigenous peoples, it 'reads in' the dispossession of Aboriginal Peoples as integral to the trajectories of resource exploitation in Australia. Through a retrospective reading of Mabo v Queensland [No 2], it demonstrates how the colonial imposition of sovereign title over resources has provided the underlying legal property form, including the derivate native title regime, that bridges colonial dispossession and Australia's continuing contribution to climate change via export of carbon resources. In articulating the interlinkages between the two phases of frontier encounter, the article challenges the designation of the Anthropocene as an explanatory rationale. It suggests that the underlying knowledge and legal system supporting the Anthropocene are part of an ideology and set of scientific practices that are entwined with the histories and legacies of colonialism and imperialism, as well as the shifting parameters of capitalism across time.

Law/text/cultureVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.