International evidence on investor rewards to firms generating environmental innovation

Abstract Using firm patents across 38 countries, we explore whether, and if so, how investors value environmental innovations (EIs). We integrate the natural-resource-based view and innovation literature not only to predict a nonlinear link between EI and market valuation but also to hypothesize that firms with stronger absorptive capacity (AC) and those with higher stakeholder influence capacity (SIC) stand to benefit the most from EI. We provide evidence in support of these predictions. Our main analysis reveals a nonlinear valuation effect of EI, but the marginal effect is positive only for firms in the top 11% of EI distribution. However, the shape of the relation varies with firm characteristics, across jurisdictions, and over time. Investors discount EI in lower AC firms, while the shares of higher AC firms trade at a premium. The differential median valuation between higher and lower SIC firms is €564.2 million. Finally, the median European firm trades at a premium, but its North American and Japanese peers trade at a discount. Our results bear implications for the modest propensity of firms to generate EI and for the observed large cross-regional variations in EI.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf048
Primary Topic
Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International evidence on investor rewards to firms generating environmental innovation

Industrial and Corporate Change
Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
article

International evidence on investor rewards to firms generating environmental innovation

article en

Abstract

Abstract Using firm patents across 38 countries, we explore whether, and if so, how investors value environmental innovations (EIs). We integrate the natural-resource-based view and innovation literature not only to predict a nonlinear link between EI and market valuation but also to hypothesize that firms with stronger absorptive capacity (AC) and those with higher stakeholder influence capacity (SIC) stand to benefit the most from EI. We provide evidence in support of these predictions. Our main analysis reveals a nonlinear valuation effect of EI, but the marginal effect is positive only for firms in the top 11% of EI distribution. However, the shape of the relation varies with firm characteristics, across jurisdictions, and over time. Investors discount EI in lower AC firms, while the shares of higher AC firms trade at a premium. The differential median valuation between higher and lower SIC firms is €564.2 million. Finally, the median European firm trades at a premium, but its North American and Japanese peers trade at a discount. Our results bear implications for the modest propensity of firms to generate EI and for the observed large cross-regional variations in EI.

Industrial and Corporate Change
ESCP Business School (FR), ESCP Business School (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

International evidence on investor rewards to firms generating environmental innovation · Industrial and Corporate Change (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS