Comparative Analysis of Crude Oil and Gas Production Prediction Using Various Machine Learning Models

Accurate forecasting of crude oil and gas production is critical to the strategic planning and operational efficiency of the energy industry. Traditional statistical approaches often fall short in capturing the non-linear and dynamic patterns inherent in petroleum production data. This research paper explores the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning techniques to predict petroleum and gas production more accurately using historical and geological datasets. The study conducts a comparative analysis of four predictive models—Linear Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LSTM—based on their performance metrics, including R-squared (R²), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The research methodology includes data preprocessing, normalization, model training, and validation using an 80-20 train-test split. The models are evaluated not only in terms of predictive accuracy but also in their ability to handle complex data structures. To enhance practical usability, the models are integrated into an interactive Streamlit dashboard that enables real-time prediction and visualization. Among the evaluated models, LSTM demonstrated superior performance due to its ability to capture time-series dependencies effectively. This paper concludes that deep learning approaches, when combined with interactive analytics tools, offer a robust framework for production forecasting in the energy sector.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17336309
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Crude Oil and Gas Production Prediction Using Various Machine Learning Models

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human Rights and Development
article

Comparative Analysis of Crude Oil and Gas Production Prediction Using Various Machine Learning Models

article en

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of crude oil and gas production is critical to the strategic planning and operational efficiency of the energy industry. Traditional statistical approaches often fall short in capturing the non-linear and dynamic patterns inherent in petroleum production data. This research paper explores the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning techniques to predict petroleum and gas production more accurately using historical and geological datasets. The study conducts a comparative analysis of four predictive models—Linear Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LSTM—based on their performance metrics, including R-squared (R²), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The research methodology includes data preprocessing, normalization, model training, and validation using an 80-20 train-test split. The models are evaluated not only in terms of predictive accuracy but also in their ability to handle complex data structures. To enhance practical usability, the models are integrated into an interactive Streamlit dashboard that enables real-time prediction and visualization. Among the evaluated models, LSTM demonstrated superior performance due to its ability to capture time-series dependencies effectively. This paper concludes that deep learning approaches, when combined with interactive analytics tools, offer a robust framework for production forecasting in the energy sector.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Career Point University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.