Disability and Educational Justice: Exploring Intersectional ways to Disrupt the Logic of Compliance

Abstract Globally, rights-based approaches claim adherence to human and civil disability rights while also recognizing that cultural, linguistic, racial, and ethnic disparities in special education outcomes remain unaddressed. We seek to understand why while demonstrating how a particular disability education policy in the global north—the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( idea ), purportedly rooted in a civil rights framework, has not assured equitable outcomes and justice for Black, Indigenous, Latine and other minoritized students of color ( bilmsoc ) labeled with a disability. Our approach elevates a complexified notion of justice, foregrounding agentic notions such as rightful presence, emancipatory learning and radical solidarity to open possibilitarian spaces of actionable systems change. Through counterstories, we illustrate how racist and ableist ideologies undergird disability policy and micro-level implementation by educators, other school and external system actors, showing the need to move beyond policy compliance towards disability justice, transformative agency and rightful presence.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Disability Studies in Education
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25888803-bja10036
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disability and Educational Justice: Exploring Intersectional ways to Disrupt the Logic of Compliance

Journal of Disability Studies in Education
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Disability and Educational Justice: Exploring Intersectional ways to Disrupt the Logic of Compliance

article en

Abstract

Abstract Globally, rights-based approaches claim adherence to human and civil disability rights while also recognizing that cultural, linguistic, racial, and ethnic disparities in special education outcomes remain unaddressed. We seek to understand why while demonstrating how a particular disability education policy in the global north—the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( idea ), purportedly rooted in a civil rights framework, has not assured equitable outcomes and justice for Black, Indigenous, Latine and other minoritized students of color ( bilmsoc ) labeled with a disability. Our approach elevates a complexified notion of justice, foregrounding agentic notions such as rightful presence, emancipatory learning and radical solidarity to open possibilitarian spaces of actionable systems change. Through counterstories, we illustrate how racist and ableist ideologies undergird disability policy and micro-level implementation by educators, other school and external system actors, showing the need to move beyond policy compliance towards disability justice, transformative agency and rightful presence.

Journal of Disability Studies in Education
Hunter College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.