EFL Students’ Perceptions of AI-Based Automated Self-Assessment in Academic Writing

This study explores English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ perceptions regarding the use of AI-based automated self-assessment tools and other writing technologies to improve grammatical accuracy and writing quality in English writing assignments. This study was conducted using qualitative methods. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with five master’s students majoring in English education at Yogyakarta State University. They were selected by purposive sampling based on their experience using AI-based tools such as Grammarly and ProWritingAid. The data were then analyzed using thematic analysis, which involved several stages, including data recognition, initial coding, theme search, theme review, and theme definition and naming. This study shows that there are five challenges of using AI-based automated self-assessment tools. These are including context and interpretation errors, difficulty understanding feedback, dependence on paid features, lots of auto-feedback, and technology limitations. In the other hand, there are four benefits of using AI-based automated self-assessment. These are including increased self-confidence, efficiency in writing, independent learning, and better writing quality. This study contributes to the ongoing discussion about the role of technology in language learning, with a focus on how technology influences student learning outcomes, motivation, and reliance on automated feedback.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1447
Primary Topic
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFL Students’ Perceptions of AI-Based Automated Self-Assessment in Academic Writing

EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
article

EFL Students’ Perceptions of AI-Based Automated Self-Assessment in Academic Writing

article en

Abstract

This study explores English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ perceptions regarding the use of AI-based automated self-assessment tools and other writing technologies to improve grammatical accuracy and writing quality in English writing assignments. This study was conducted using qualitative methods. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with five master’s students majoring in English education at Yogyakarta State University. They were selected by purposive sampling based on their experience using AI-based tools such as Grammarly and ProWritingAid. The data were then analyzed using thematic analysis, which involved several stages, including data recognition, initial coding, theme search, theme review, and theme definition and naming. This study shows that there are five challenges of using AI-based automated self-assessment tools. These are including context and interpretation errors, difficulty understanding feedback, dependence on paid features, lots of auto-feedback, and technology limitations. In the other hand, there are four benefits of using AI-based automated self-assessment. These are including increased self-confidence, efficiency in writing, independent learning, and better writing quality. This study contributes to the ongoing discussion about the role of technology in language learning, with a focus on how technology influences student learning outcomes, motivation, and reliance on automated feedback.

EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan PembelajaranVol. 6(1)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.