Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening program in the Czech Republic

Summary: Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a key tool for secondary prevention, whose eff ectiveness depends on population participation, accessibility of care, and quality of the examinations. Its impact is further determined by systematic data collection and analysis. High-quality data represent a fundamental pillar for monitoring ongoing screening, evaluating outcomes, and identifying weaknesses in the program. The aim is to demonstrate the benefi ts of data for optimizing the Czech program through two case studies. Methods: Data sources included the National Health Information System and the Database of Preventive Colonoscopies managed by the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, complemented with sociodemographic data from the Czech Statistical Offi ce. Evaluation was carried out using screening quality indicators and a budget impact analysis focused on the change of age limits in screening. Results: The fi rst case study shows a 33% decrease in CRC incidence and a 49% reduction in mortality since program implementation. Coverage of the target population has long remained around 30%. In 2020, a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) rose to 10%. The interval between a positive FOBT and fol low-up colonoscopy corresponds to 3 months. The uptake of fol low-up colonoscopy after a positive FOBT reaches 60%. The second case study revealed that expanding the eligible age range from 45– 74 years will initially lead to a 5– 6% increase in costs; however, from 2029 onwards, a reduction is expected. Discussion: The fi rst study demonstrates the success of screening in reducing incidence and mortality, while also highlighting challenges such as low coverage, high FOBT positives, long waiting times for fol low-up colonoscopy, and low uptake of fol low-up colonoscopy. The second study found that expanding the age range will be cost-eff ective. Data confi rm the benefi ts of screening for population health and indicate areas requiring further attention. Conclusion: Systematically collected and analyzed data are an essential component for evaluating and managing screening programs. The case studies illustrate their applicability in monitoring care quality and supporting health policy decisions. Key words: colorectal cancer – adenoma – screening – colonoscopy – fecal occult blood test – quality indicators – data – statistical analysis

Publication Details

Journal
Gastroenterologie a hepatologie
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48095/ccgh2025361
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening program in the Czech Republic

Gastroenterologie a hepatologie
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening program in the Czech Republic

article en

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a key tool for secondary prevention, whose eff ectiveness depends on population participation, accessibility of care, and quality of the examinations. Its impact is further determined by systematic data collection and analysis. High-quality data represent a fundamental pillar for monitoring ongoing screening, evaluating outcomes, and identifying weaknesses in the program. The aim is to demonstrate the benefi ts of data for optimizing the Czech program through two case studies. Methods: Data sources included the National Health Information System and the Database of Preventive Colonoscopies managed by the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, complemented with sociodemographic data from the Czech Statistical Offi ce. Evaluation was carried out using screening quality indicators and a budget impact analysis focused on the change of age limits in screening. Results: The fi rst case study shows a 33% decrease in CRC incidence and a 49% reduction in mortality since program implementation. Coverage of the target population has long remained around 30%. In 2020, a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) rose to 10%. The interval between a positive FOBT and fol low-up colonoscopy corresponds to 3 months. The uptake of fol low-up colonoscopy after a positive FOBT reaches 60%. The second case study revealed that expanding the eligible age range from 45– 74 years will initially lead to a 5– 6% increase in costs; however, from 2029 onwards, a reduction is expected. Discussion: The fi rst study demonstrates the success of screening in reducing incidence and mortality, while also highlighting challenges such as low coverage, high FOBT positives, long waiting times for fol low-up colonoscopy, and low uptake of fol low-up colonoscopy. The second study found that expanding the age range will be cost-eff ective. Data confi rm the benefi ts of screening for population health and indicate areas requiring further attention. Conclusion: Systematically collected and analyzed data are an essential component for evaluating and managing screening programs. The case studies illustrate their applicability in monitoring care quality and supporting health policy decisions. Key words: colorectal cancer – adenoma – screening – colonoscopy – fecal occult blood test – quality indicators – data – statistical analysis

Gastroenterologie a hepatologieVol. 79(5)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening program in the Czech Republic · Gastroenterologie a hepatologie (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS