Case Study of Core Competency Diagnosis Operation Procedures and Support Strategies within University Education

[Objective] This study explores the operational process of a core competency diagnostic system implemented at University A to support future talent development. Using a case study approach, the research analyzed the experiences of 24 undergraduate students who participated in the system, including diagnosis, expert consulting, and follow-up activities. [Contents] The diagnostic process included regular and optional testing, simplified result reports, and a structured consulting model. Students reported that they were able to interpret their results, reflect on their competencies, and revise their learning plans. Key strategies such as consultant role clarification, professional training, and pre-diagnostic guidance were found to enhance student engagement and understanding. [Conclusions] The findings suggest that a structured and supportive diagnostic system can promote students’ self-awareness and competency development. This case provides a practical model for other universities seeking to implement or improve competency-based education and assessment.

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58601/kjre.2025.09.30.07
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Study of Core Competency Diagnosis Operation Procedures and Support Strategies within University Education

Competency Development and Evaluation
article

Case Study of Core Competency Diagnosis Operation Procedures and Support Strategies within University Education

article en

Abstract

[Objective] This study explores the operational process of a core competency diagnostic system implemented at University A to support future talent development. Using a case study approach, the research analyzed the experiences of 24 undergraduate students who participated in the system, including diagnosis, expert consulting, and follow-up activities. [Contents] The diagnostic process included regular and optional testing, simplified result reports, and a structured consulting model. Students reported that they were able to interpret their results, reflect on their competencies, and revise their learning plans. Key strategies such as consultant role clarification, professional training, and pre-diagnostic guidance were found to enhance student engagement and understanding. [Conclusions] The findings suggest that a structured and supportive diagnostic system can promote students’ self-awareness and competency development. This case provides a practical model for other universities seeking to implement or improve competency-based education and assessment.

Vol. 82
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Competency Development and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.