Empirical analysis of study materials preferences and usage trends in educational institutions
Abstract Access to affordable and effective study materials is essential for enhancing students’ academic performance and learning outcomes. This study empirically analyses the demand and choice of study materials among 200 students across different educational levels using a structured survey and data visualisations through Microsoft Power BI. The survey explored key aspects such as frequency of purchasing study materials, preferred formats, influencing factors, expenditure patterns, sources, cost-effectiveness perceptions, accessibility challenges and perceived effectiveness in exam preparation. Results revealed that 41.5% of students occasionally buy study materials, with printed notes (39%) being the most preferred format, followed by e-notes and Xerox copies (23.5% each). Convenience (33.5%) and availability (26%) emerged as the primary factors influencing choices, while most students (71%) reported spending less than ₹300 per month. Books (47.5%) remain the most relied-upon source, though AI tools are gaining significance (31.5%). While 74.5% of respondents viewed e-notes as more cost-effective than Xerox copies, 64.5% faced digital access challenges due to internet or device limitations. Perceptions of Xerox shop pricing were divided, with 42.5% considering charges unfair. For exam preparation, class notes (37%) and books (34.5%) were preferred over AI tools (28.5%). The findings underscore the coexistence of traditional and digital resources, with students' choices shaped by convenience, affordability, and exam relevance. The study concludes that a balanced strategy incorporating both digital and class notes is crucial for effective learning.
Institutions
- Department of Biotechnology (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-10-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17333797
- Primary Topic
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00