Mapping research grant corruption in China: a case study of Beijing

Abstract Research grant corruption in higher education institutions, which remains a relatively rare enterprise in the field of white-collar crimes, has been unchecked in China in recent years. This study takes the indicative approach to access 14 research grant corruption cases in higher education institutions in Beijing, China, from 2014 to 2022. The results show that grant corruption in higher education institutions emerged with particular characteristics, with a limited number of cases proceeding into criminal trials. It is found that joint crime is common in cases involving embezzlement, where offenders, often senior intellectuals in senior-ranked positions, adopt direct approaches to committing the crime. The causes of research grant corruption in higher education institutions were multifaceted, forming an opportunity triangle of three parties in higher education institution funding: the funding organizations, the commissioned organization (higher educational institutions), and the funded (researchers). A lack of communication between the funding organizations and those who are funded, inadequate supervision of the commissioned organization, and a paucity of funding audits are believed to be the leading causes of higher education institution funding corruption, which helps breed opportunities for monopolizing research funding. The study also provides countermeasures to intercept corruption opportunities and prevent research grant embezzlement, including audit scrutiny, research fund reimbursement and reform, and risk prevention mechanisms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Legal Discourse
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2025-2017
Primary Topic
Education and Character Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping research grant corruption in China: a case study of Beijing

International Journal of Legal Discourse
Education and Character Development
article

Mapping research grant corruption in China: a case study of Beijing

article en

Abstract

Abstract Research grant corruption in higher education institutions, which remains a relatively rare enterprise in the field of white-collar crimes, has been unchecked in China in recent years. This study takes the indicative approach to access 14 research grant corruption cases in higher education institutions in Beijing, China, from 2014 to 2022. The results show that grant corruption in higher education institutions emerged with particular characteristics, with a limited number of cases proceeding into criminal trials. It is found that joint crime is common in cases involving embezzlement, where offenders, often senior intellectuals in senior-ranked positions, adopt direct approaches to committing the crime. The causes of research grant corruption in higher education institutions were multifaceted, forming an opportunity triangle of three parties in higher education institution funding: the funding organizations, the commissioned organization (higher educational institutions), and the funded (researchers). A lack of communication between the funding organizations and those who are funded, inadequate supervision of the commissioned organization, and a paucity of funding audits are believed to be the leading causes of higher education institution funding corruption, which helps breed opportunities for monopolizing research funding. The study also provides countermeasures to intercept corruption opportunities and prevent research grant embezzlement, including audit scrutiny, research fund reimbursement and reform, and risk prevention mechanisms.

International Journal of Legal DiscourseVol. 10(2)
University of International Business and Economics (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), South China Institute of Collaborative Innovation (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Education and Character Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mapping research grant corruption in China: a case study of Beijing · International Journal of Legal Discourse (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS