RISIKO HUKUM DAN FISKAL DARI PEMBAGIAN INSENTIF DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEPABEANAN: STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP PASAL 113D UU KEPABEANAN INDONESIA

This study examines the legal and fiscal implications of the premium policy in Indonesia's customs law enforcement system under Article 113D of the Customs Law. The provision grants a maximum premium of 50% of fines or auction proceeds from confiscated goods to those who contribute to uncovering customs violations. While aimed at enhancing bureaucratic efficiency, the policy raises concerns such as moral hazard, conflicts of interest, and perverse incentives. These may undermine fiscal accountability, transparency, and the principle of justice within good governance. Using a normative and public policy approach, this study assesses the compatibility of the provision with the principles of the rule of law and sound fiscal governance. It concludes that the incentive scheme risks institutional legitimacy and erodes public trust. Reformulating the premium policy is essential to focus on public service, professional conduct, and national interest.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JIL Journal of Indonesian Law
Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18326/jil.v6i1.4159
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RISIKO HUKUM DAN FISKAL DARI PEMBAGIAN INSENTIF DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEPABEANAN: STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP PASAL 113D UU KEPABEANAN INDONESIA

JIL Journal of Indonesian Law
Legal Studies and Policies
article

RISIKO HUKUM DAN FISKAL DARI PEMBAGIAN INSENTIF DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEPABEANAN: STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP PASAL 113D UU KEPABEANAN INDONESIA

article en

Abstract

This study examines the legal and fiscal implications of the premium policy in Indonesia's customs law enforcement system under Article 113D of the Customs Law. The provision grants a maximum premium of 50% of fines or auction proceeds from confiscated goods to those who contribute to uncovering customs violations. While aimed at enhancing bureaucratic efficiency, the policy raises concerns such as moral hazard, conflicts of interest, and perverse incentives. These may undermine fiscal accountability, transparency, and the principle of justice within good governance. Using a normative and public policy approach, this study assesses the compatibility of the provision with the principles of the rule of law and sound fiscal governance. It concludes that the incentive scheme risks institutional legitimacy and erodes public trust. Reformulating the premium policy is essential to focus on public service, professional conduct, and national interest.

JIL Journal of Indonesian LawVol. 6(1)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RISIKO HUKUM DAN FISKAL DARI PEMBAGIAN INSENTIF DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEPABEANAN: STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP PASAL 113D UU KEPABEANAN INDONESIA · JIL Journal of Indonesian Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS