JUDICIAL ETHICS AND THE INFLUENCE OF MORAL MOTIVES ON JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING

This article explores the philosophical and ethical foundations of judicial ethics and the role of moral motives in judicial decision-making. The study examines how moral reflection, conscience, and civic responsibility influence the fairness and legitimacy of judicial decisions. The research also analyzes the views of scholars such as Israilova, Abdurakhmanova, Talapov, Babajonov, Luban, Radbruch, Ricoeur, and Rodotà to demonstrate that judicial ethics represent not only professional conduct but also a manifestation of moral reasoning within the legal order. The article concludes that the legitimacy of the judiciary depends on its ability to harmonize legal norms with moral imperatives, thus ensuring justice, human dignity, and social trust.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17332079
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JUDICIAL ETHICS AND THE INFLUENCE OF MORAL MOTIVES ON JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

JUDICIAL ETHICS AND THE INFLUENCE OF MORAL MOTIVES ON JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING

article en

Abstract

This article explores the philosophical and ethical foundations of judicial ethics and the role of moral motives in judicial decision-making. The study examines how moral reflection, conscience, and civic responsibility influence the fairness and legitimacy of judicial decisions. The research also analyzes the views of scholars such as Israilova, Abdurakhmanova, Talapov, Babajonov, Luban, Radbruch, Ricoeur, and Rodotà to demonstrate that judicial ethics represent not only professional conduct but also a manifestation of moral reasoning within the legal order. The article concludes that the legitimacy of the judiciary depends on its ability to harmonize legal norms with moral imperatives, thus ensuring justice, human dignity, and social trust.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.