Reimagining the Japanese Literary Canon: Literary Multilingualism in Contemporary Japanese Literature

Abstract The study of contemporary Japanese literature is still based on a compartmentalised canon rooted in an arcane paradigm that values the author’s linguistic and national background more than it values their works. Thus, examples of literary multilingualism in the writing of national authors, as well as the works of translingual writers, are only sparsely acknowledged. Even more rare are occurrences in which works of national and translingual authors are regarded as part of the same literary scene. This article proposes a comparison between the national authors Murakami Ryū and Shimada Masahiko, and the translingual writer Levy Hideo, to highlight the similarities between their language to argue that the current national approach to Japanese literary study needs to be questioned in light of the relevance of multilingual writing as a consequence of the cultural contacts that have influenced the Japanese language.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Literary Multilingualism
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/2667324x-2025xx08
Primary Topic
Comparative and World Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining the Japanese Literary Canon: Literary Multilingualism in Contemporary Japanese Literature

Journal of Literary Multilingualism
Comparative and World Literature
article

Reimagining the Japanese Literary Canon: Literary Multilingualism in Contemporary Japanese Literature

article en

Abstract

Abstract The study of contemporary Japanese literature is still based on a compartmentalised canon rooted in an arcane paradigm that values the author’s linguistic and national background more than it values their works. Thus, examples of literary multilingualism in the writing of national authors, as well as the works of translingual writers, are only sparsely acknowledged. Even more rare are occurrences in which works of national and translingual authors are regarded as part of the same literary scene. This article proposes a comparison between the national authors Murakami Ryū and Shimada Masahiko, and the translingual writer Levy Hideo, to highlight the similarities between their language to argue that the current national approach to Japanese literary study needs to be questioned in light of the relevance of multilingual writing as a consequence of the cultural contacts that have influenced the Japanese language.

Journal of Literary Multilingualism
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Comparative and World Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reimagining the Japanese Literary Canon: Literary Multilingualism in Contemporary Japanese Literature · Journal of Literary Multilingualism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS