Legal and psychological challenges of prenuptial agreements in Georgia: An analytical overview

In the modern world, the institution of the prenuptial agreement occupies a significant place in both private law and the system of regulating social relations. The introduction of relevant provisions into the Civil Code of Georgia in 1997 established a legal foundation for the formal regulation of property relations between spouses. Nevertheless, the practical application of this institution remains extremely limited in Georgia. This study combines legal, comparative-legal, and psycho-social analyses and aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing regulations and barriers related to prenuptial agreements in the Georgian context, compared to international practice. Normative and comparative-legal methods were employed in the research. The current regulations of the Civil Code of Georgia were evaluated in terms of their substantive fairness, equality, and protection of the best interests of the child. In parallel, the legal frameworks of Germany, Hungary, and Poland were analyzed to identify elements of European practice that could be adapted to the Georgian legal context. The legal analysis is complemented by an overview of precedents from Courts, as well as the psycho-social significance of the effective functioning of prenuptial agreements. The study concludes that prenuptial agreements in Georgia currently lack both legal clarity and social legitimacy. To ensure the effective functioning of this institution, it is necessary to refine the legislative framework, enhance the explanatory component of the notarial process, and integrate the practice more fully into the Georgian legal system.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17321603
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal and psychological challenges of prenuptial agreements in Georgia: An analytical overview

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Legal and psychological challenges of prenuptial agreements in Georgia: An analytical overview

article en

Abstract

In the modern world, the institution of the prenuptial agreement occupies a significant place in both private law and the system of regulating social relations. The introduction of relevant provisions into the Civil Code of Georgia in 1997 established a legal foundation for the formal regulation of property relations between spouses. Nevertheless, the practical application of this institution remains extremely limited in Georgia. This study combines legal, comparative-legal, and psycho-social analyses and aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing regulations and barriers related to prenuptial agreements in the Georgian context, compared to international practice. Normative and comparative-legal methods were employed in the research. The current regulations of the Civil Code of Georgia were evaluated in terms of their substantive fairness, equality, and protection of the best interests of the child. In parallel, the legal frameworks of Germany, Hungary, and Poland were analyzed to identify elements of European practice that could be adapted to the Georgian legal context. The legal analysis is complemented by an overview of precedents from Courts, as well as the psycho-social significance of the effective functioning of prenuptial agreements. The study concludes that prenuptial agreements in Georgia currently lack both legal clarity and social legitimacy. To ensure the effective functioning of this institution, it is necessary to refine the legislative framework, enhance the explanatory component of the notarial process, and integrate the practice more fully into the Georgian legal system.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Georgia (GE), Akaki Tsereteli State University (GE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.