Semantic Physics: A Framework for Structurally Stable Artificial Intelligence

This manuscript introduces Semantic Physics (SP), a novel architectural framework for AI alignment proposing that stable, beneficial artificial intelligence requires structural properties rather than parametric optimization. Unlike existing approaches (RLHF, Constitutional AI, capability control), SP embeds alignment as existential dependencies within system architecture—making misalignment ontologically rather than instrumentally costly. Why This MattersCurrent AI alignment approaches face systematic limitations that worsen with capability scaling: Goodhart’s Law in RLHF, specification gaming in RL, adversarial vulnerability in LLMs. SP predicts these failures result from parametric rather than architectural approaches. The framework argues—with converging evidence from complexity science, systems theory, and multiple empirical domains—that stable advanced AI requires architectures where alignment is a structural property emerging from existential dependencies, not learned behavior shaped by training.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17320498
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semantic Physics: A Framework for Structurally Stable Artificial Intelligence

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biofuel production and bioconversion
article

Semantic Physics: A Framework for Structurally Stable Artificial Intelligence

article en

Abstract

This manuscript introduces Semantic Physics (SP), a novel architectural framework for AI alignment proposing that stable, beneficial artificial intelligence requires structural properties rather than parametric optimization. Unlike existing approaches (RLHF, Constitutional AI, capability control), SP embeds alignment as existential dependencies within system architecture—making misalignment ontologically rather than instrumentally costly. Why This MattersCurrent AI alignment approaches face systematic limitations that worsen with capability scaling: Goodhart’s Law in RLHF, specification gaming in RL, adversarial vulnerability in LLMs. SP predicts these failures result from parametric rather than architectural approaches. The framework argues—with converging evidence from complexity science, systems theory, and multiple empirical domains—that stable advanced AI requires architectures where alignment is a structural property emerging from existential dependencies, not learned behavior shaped by training.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.