“We Must Be Open to New Technology”

Abstract Since the 1980s, innovation has emerged as the dominant epistemic framework for imagining and engineering futures across much of Europe and America. This article investigates the cultural and political work performed by contemporary innovation discourse, using Germany's Future Strategy for Research and Innovation as a case study. The analysis draws on methods from literary studies and conceptual history to approach innovation as a mode of governance that is both historically contingent and symbolically charged. The article traces how innovation narratives are structured by a recurrent binary of promise and threat—projecting technological progress as national redemption while mobilizing anxieties over decline and obsolescence. The analysis reveals that, in the name of seemingly depoliticized foresight, innovation discourse legitimizes specific policy agendas, privileges particular technological trajectories, and reorders socio-economic priorities. By foregrounding the normative and rhetorical dimensions of innovation discourse, the article calls for a more critically attuned understanding of its political stakes and showcases the distinctive contributions that cultural analysis can offer to debates on science and technology policy.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.122126
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We Must Be Open to New Technology”

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

“We Must Be Open to New Technology”

article en

Abstract

Abstract Since the 1980s, innovation has emerged as the dominant epistemic framework for imagining and engineering futures across much of Europe and America. This article investigates the cultural and political work performed by contemporary innovation discourse, using Germany's Future Strategy for Research and Innovation as a case study. The analysis draws on methods from literary studies and conceptual history to approach innovation as a mode of governance that is both historically contingent and symbolically charged. The article traces how innovation narratives are structured by a recurrent binary of promise and threat—projecting technological progress as national redemption while mobilizing anxieties over decline and obsolescence. The analysis reveals that, in the name of seemingly depoliticized foresight, innovation discourse legitimizes specific policy agendas, privileges particular technological trajectories, and reorders socio-economic priorities. By foregrounding the normative and rhetorical dimensions of innovation discourse, the article calls for a more critically attuned understanding of its political stakes and showcases the distinctive contributions that cultural analysis can offer to debates on science and technology policy.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“We Must Be Open to New Technology” · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS