Poppea rectispina

Poppea rectispina (Fairmaire, 1846) Cyphonia rectispina Fairmaire, 1846: 502. Poppea rectispina (Fairmaire, 1846) in Stål, 1867: 551. Poppea longicornis Plummer, 1935: 375. To Poppea rectispina Plummer, 1935 in Kopp & Yonke, 1979: 33. Fig. 30 A–D. Type status. Paratypes. Condition. Specimens well preserved. Material examined. 1♀, [“ Cuernavaca, / Mor., Mexico / 29-XII 1931 ”]; [HOLOTIPO? / Poppea / longicornis / Det. / C.C. Plummer 19_ _]. 1♀, [“ Cuernavaca, / Mor., Mexico / 5-XII 1931 ”]; [ALOTIPO / Poppea / longicornis / Det. / C.C. Plummer 19_ _]. 2♀, [“ Cuernavaca, / Mor., Mexico / 29-XII 1931 ”]; [PARATIPO / Poppea / longicornis / Det. / C.C. Plummer 19_ _]. Distribution. Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia, and Peru. Records in Mexico. Cuernavaca (MOR); Coatepec (VER). Host plants. Unknown. Notes. Of the four specimens reviewed, one female is labeled as holotype, another female as allotype (= paratype), and the remaining two paratypes. However, data provided for the holotype match information in the original description by Plummer (1936), but those of the “ allotype ” do not. Plummer, while conducting fieldwork in Mexico during the 1930s to early 40s, worked closely with the government agency of Secretaría de Agricultura y Fomento (late 1940s; Marin pers. comm.) and was provided with collecting gear, drawers, type labels, etc. During his stay, attached labels to specimens examined (Fig. 30 D), do not indicate the date of determination and may have been added subsequent to Plummer’s publications. Presumably, some changes were made by Plummer between the time when he examined the specimens and the time when the species descriptions were published. Plummer (1936) stated that the type series included 8 female and 1 male paratype, in addition to the female holotype and male allotype. We consider the two female specimens examined to be paratypes because the label data are consistent with information provided in the original description. References. Fairmaire (1846), Kopp & Yonke (1979), Plummer (1935), and Stål (1867).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17320215
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poppea rectispina

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Poppea rectispina

article en

Abstract

Poppea rectispina (Fairmaire, 1846) Cyphonia rectispina Fairmaire, 1846: 502. Poppea rectispina (Fairmaire, 1846) in Stål, 1867: 551. Poppea longicornis Plummer, 1935: 375. To Poppea rectispina Plummer, 1935 in Kopp & Yonke, 1979: 33. Fig. 30 A–D. Type status. Paratypes. Condition. Specimens well preserved. Material examined. 1♀, [“ Cuernavaca, / Mor., Mexico / 29-XII 1931 ”]; [HOLOTIPO? / Poppea / longicornis / Det. / C.C. Plummer 19_ _]. 1♀, [“ Cuernavaca, / Mor., Mexico / 5-XII 1931 ”]; [ALOTIPO / Poppea / longicornis / Det. / C.C. Plummer 19_ _]. 2♀, [“ Cuernavaca, / Mor., Mexico / 29-XII 1931 ”]; [PARATIPO / Poppea / longicornis / Det. / C.C. Plummer 19_ _]. Distribution. Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia, and Peru. Records in Mexico. Cuernavaca (MOR); Coatepec (VER). Host plants. Unknown. Notes. Of the four specimens reviewed, one female is labeled as holotype, another female as allotype (= paratype), and the remaining two paratypes. However, data provided for the holotype match information in the original description by Plummer (1936), but those of the “ allotype ” do not. Plummer, while conducting fieldwork in Mexico during the 1930s to early 40s, worked closely with the government agency of Secretaría de Agricultura y Fomento (late 1940s; Marin pers. comm.) and was provided with collecting gear, drawers, type labels, etc. During his stay, attached labels to specimens examined (Fig. 30 D), do not indicate the date of determination and may have been added subsequent to Plummer’s publications. Presumably, some changes were made by Plummer between the time when he examined the specimens and the time when the species descriptions were published. Plummer (1936) stated that the type series included 8 female and 1 male paratype, in addition to the female holotype and male allotype. We consider the two female specimens examined to be paratypes because the label data are consistent with information provided in the original description. References. Fairmaire (1846), Kopp & Yonke (1979), Plummer (1935), and Stål (1867).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX), Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (MX), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (MX), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias (MX), Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.