Retrospective Study of Survival and Clinico Pathological Characteristics of Different Histopathological Grades of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients: A Rural Cancer Centre Experience

Abstract Background: Histopathological grading is an essential prognostic tool in breast cancer management. In rural India, limited healthcare access often leads to late diagnosis and poor survival. Understanding the clinicopathological profile of various tumor grades can help to optimize treatment strategies in resource-constrained settings. Aim: To evaluate the clinico-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes associated with different histological grades of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in a rural cancer centre. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 486 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between June 2021 and June 2023. Tumors were graded using the Nottingham system. Demographic, pathological, and treatment details were analyzed. Survival outcomes—disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)—were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and associations were evaluated using Chi-square and log-rank tests. Results: Of the 486 patients, 21.0% had Grade I, 45.7% Grade II, and 33.3% Grade III tumors. Higher tumor grade was significantly associated with larger size, lymph node positivity, HER2 positivity, and triple-negative phenotype (p<0.001). Hormone receptor positivity declined with increasing grade. Grade I tumors had superior 3-year DFS (89.2%) and OS (93.1%) compared to Grade III (58.1% and 71.6%, respectively) (p<0.001). BMI was also correlated with grade and survival—obese patients (≥30 kg/m²) had a higher proportion of Grade III tumors and poorer outcomes. Conclusion: Histological grade is a strong predictor of aggressive tumor biology and poor prognosis in breast cancer. In rural settings, early diagnosis and grading-based risk stratification can guide effective treatment planning. Improving access to diagnostic tools and targeted therapies is vital to reducing rural-urban disparities in breast cancer outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17317519
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective Study of Survival and Clinico Pathological Characteristics of Different Histopathological Grades of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients: A Rural Cancer Centre Experience

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Retrospective Study of Survival and Clinico Pathological Characteristics of Different Histopathological Grades of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients: A Rural Cancer Centre Experience

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Histopathological grading is an essential prognostic tool in breast cancer management. In rural India, limited healthcare access often leads to late diagnosis and poor survival. Understanding the clinicopathological profile of various tumor grades can help to optimize treatment strategies in resource-constrained settings. Aim: To evaluate the clinico-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes associated with different histological grades of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in a rural cancer centre. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 486 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between June 2021 and June 2023. Tumors were graded using the Nottingham system. Demographic, pathological, and treatment details were analyzed. Survival outcomes—disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)—were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and associations were evaluated using Chi-square and log-rank tests. Results: Of the 486 patients, 21.0% had Grade I, 45.7% Grade II, and 33.3% Grade III tumors. Higher tumor grade was significantly associated with larger size, lymph node positivity, HER2 positivity, and triple-negative phenotype (p<0.001). Hormone receptor positivity declined with increasing grade. Grade I tumors had superior 3-year DFS (89.2%) and OS (93.1%) compared to Grade III (58.1% and 71.6%, respectively) (p<0.001). BMI was also correlated with grade and survival—obese patients (≥30 kg/m²) had a higher proportion of Grade III tumors and poorer outcomes. Conclusion: Histological grade is a strong predictor of aggressive tumor biology and poor prognosis in breast cancer. In rural settings, early diagnosis and grading-based risk stratification can guide effective treatment planning. Improving access to diagnostic tools and targeted therapies is vital to reducing rural-urban disparities in breast cancer outcomes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government of West Bengal (IN), Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital (IN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.