Batas Kewenangan Advokat dalam Membela Klien terkait dengan Delik Obstruction of Justice

The issue of accusations of obstructing or obstructing the legal process carried out by the Advocate in his capacity to defend the client is problematic. The aim of this study is to describe the right to immunity possessed by advocates in the aspect of law enforcement. As well as aiming to find out the criminal liability of Advocates for Obstruction of Justice carried out during the legal process. This writing uses the normative law research method, which is a method or method used in one of the legal research conducted by reviewing the literature and aimed at written regulations. This study show that the right to immunity applies as long as there is good faith that can be held accountable by the Advocate both outside and in the trial in order to protect the legal interests of his client. Meanwhile, in the criminal aspect against Advocates who are proven to have committed obstruction of justice and injured good faith by committing acts that are against the Law to obstruct the law enforcement process.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62383/prosemnashuk.v1i2.42
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Batas Kewenangan Advokat dalam Membela Klien terkait dengan Delik Obstruction of Justice

Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Batas Kewenangan Advokat dalam Membela Klien terkait dengan Delik Obstruction of Justice

article en

Abstract

The issue of accusations of obstructing or obstructing the legal process carried out by the Advocate in his capacity to defend the client is problematic. The aim of this study is to describe the right to immunity possessed by advocates in the aspect of law enforcement. As well as aiming to find out the criminal liability of Advocates for Obstruction of Justice carried out during the legal process. This writing uses the normative law research method, which is a method or method used in one of the legal research conducted by reviewing the literature and aimed at written regulations. This study show that the right to immunity applies as long as there is good faith that can be held accountable by the Advocate both outside and in the trial in order to protect the legal interests of his client. Meanwhile, in the criminal aspect against Advocates who are proven to have committed obstruction of justice and injured good faith by committing acts that are against the Law to obstruct the law enforcement process.

Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu HukumVol. 1(2)
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Batas Kewenangan Advokat dalam Membela Klien terkait dengan Delik Obstruction of Justice · Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS