Political Parallelism and Voters' Choice of Candidates in Elections

This study critically examined political parallelism and voters’ choice of candidates in elections, drawing attention to how partisan alignments between media institutions and political actors shape electoral decision-making in Nigeria. Despite growing scholarly interest in media influence on political communication, the specific concept of political parallelism has received limited attention within Nigerian academia. Most existing literature focused on agenda setting, framing or media bias in general, without clearly theorising how structural or ideological media alignments influence voters' choices. This conceptual gap necessitated a focused analysis of political parallelism and its implications for electoral behaviour. Anchored on the political parallelism theory, the researchers adopted a qualitative, literature-based methodology. It drew from verified empirical studies and theoretical sources to establish how ownership structures, editorial loyalties and partisan framing practices distort the informational environment during elections. It argued that such distortion narrows the democratic space by undermining voters’ access to balanced political discourse and reinforcing ethno-political loyalties. The study showed that politically-aligned media content often amplifies dominant narratives, excluding dissenting views and manipulates electoral perceptions thereby strongly influencing voters’ choices, irrespective of objective narratives, candidates’ manifestoes or portfolios. It concluded that political parallelism, if unaddressed, will continue to compromise electoral credibility and deepen political polarisation. To counteract these effects, the paper recommended regulatory reforms that promote editorial independence, enforcement of professional media ethics and investment in media literacy programmes to equip citizens with critical interpretive skills. Keywords: Political Parallelism, Media Ownership, Voter Behaviour, Editorial Bias, Nigerian Elections

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17259937
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Parallelism and Voters' Choice of Candidates in Elections

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Political Parallelism and Voters' Choice of Candidates in Elections

article en

Abstract

This study critically examined political parallelism and voters’ choice of candidates in elections, drawing attention to how partisan alignments between media institutions and political actors shape electoral decision-making in Nigeria. Despite growing scholarly interest in media influence on political communication, the specific concept of political parallelism has received limited attention within Nigerian academia. Most existing literature focused on agenda setting, framing or media bias in general, without clearly theorising how structural or ideological media alignments influence voters' choices. This conceptual gap necessitated a focused analysis of political parallelism and its implications for electoral behaviour. Anchored on the political parallelism theory, the researchers adopted a qualitative, literature-based methodology. It drew from verified empirical studies and theoretical sources to establish how ownership structures, editorial loyalties and partisan framing practices distort the informational environment during elections. It argued that such distortion narrows the democratic space by undermining voters’ access to balanced political discourse and reinforcing ethno-political loyalties. The study showed that politically-aligned media content often amplifies dominant narratives, excluding dissenting views and manipulates electoral perceptions thereby strongly influencing voters’ choices, irrespective of objective narratives, candidates’ manifestoes or portfolios. It concluded that political parallelism, if unaddressed, will continue to compromise electoral credibility and deepen political polarisation. To counteract these effects, the paper recommended regulatory reforms that promote editorial independence, enforcement of professional media ethics and investment in media literacy programmes to equip citizens with critical interpretive skills. Keywords: Political Parallelism, Media Ownership, Voter Behaviour, Editorial Bias, Nigerian Elections

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Political Parallelism and Voters' Choice of Candidates in Elections · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS