Enhancing environmental indicator trustworthiness: A framework for user-specific quality assessment of spatial input data using data-fitness-for-purpose principles

The presentation introduces a framework for improving the trustworthiness of environmental indicators through user-specific quality assessments of spatial input data based on data-fitness-for-use (DFFU) and data-fitness-for-purpose (DFFP) principles. It distinguishes between general data suitability (DFFU) and context-dependent usability (DFFP), highlighting challenges in assessing input data quality when reference data are unavailable. Using case examples from biodiversity and extreme weather indicators, the study shows that standard accuracy metrics are insufficient for composite indicators lacking spatial accuracy information. It proposes extending geospatial quality standards like ISO 19157-1 by incorporating spatial uncertainty metrics to evaluate and communicate data usability. The framework aligns with FAIR principles, promoting data reusability and AI readiness through the structured packaging of research objects with quality metadata.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17306478
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing environmental indicator trustworthiness: A framework for user-specific quality assessment of spatial input data using data-fitness-for-purpose principles

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Enhancing environmental indicator trustworthiness: A framework for user-specific quality assessment of spatial input data using data-fitness-for-purpose principles

article en

Abstract

The presentation introduces a framework for improving the trustworthiness of environmental indicators through user-specific quality assessments of spatial input data based on data-fitness-for-use (DFFU) and data-fitness-for-purpose (DFFP) principles. It distinguishes between general data suitability (DFFU) and context-dependent usability (DFFP), highlighting challenges in assessing input data quality when reference data are unavailable. Using case examples from biodiversity and extreme weather indicators, the study shows that standard accuracy metrics are insufficient for composite indicators lacking spatial accuracy information. It proposes extending geospatial quality standards like ISO 19157-1 by incorporating spatial uncertainty metrics to evaluate and communicate data usability. The framework aligns with FAIR principles, promoting data reusability and AI readiness through the structured packaging of research objects with quality metadata.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Julius Kühn-Institut (DE), Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research (DE), Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.