Mental Health of Combatants vs. Non-Combatants in Middle Eastern Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the psychological impact differences between individuals who served as combatants and those classified as non-combatants within the context of armed conflicts in the Middle East, through a meta-analysis of 47 independent studies involving a total of 28,463 participants and published between 2010 and 2024. The principal findings of this quantitative synthesis indicate that the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is significantly higher among combatants, reaching 73.8%, compared to non-combatants, who reported a rate of 52.4%, with a large effect size (d=0.89, p<.001). Furthermore, results from multilevel regression analysis reveal that the duration of exposure to conflict is the strongest predictor of PTSD symptoms (β=0.67, p<.001), followed by the intensity of combat, which also contributes significantly (β=0.54, p<.001). In addition, major depression was documented in 64.2% of individuals within the combatant group and 48.7% among non-combatants, with an odds ratio of 2.34 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 1.98 to 2.76. Anxiety disorders were also more prevalent among combatants, at 58.9%, compared to 41.3% in non-combatants, with a relative risk of 1.78 (p<.001). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in coping strategy preferences, with combatants tending to rely more heavily on avoidance mechanisms, recorded at 69.5% versus 45.2% among non-combatants. This meta-analytic finding expands upon the studies by Eltanamly et al. (2021) on war-induced trauma and by Figley & Nash (2011) regarding psychological defense mechanisms, with its distinct contribution lying in the identification of specific patterns of mental disorders influenced by individual roles within conflict dynamics. Overall, this research concludes that combatants exhibit a distinctive pattern of trauma manifestation and demonstrate a higher threshold of resistance to conventional therapeutic interventions, thus making a significant contribution to the formulation of role-based trauma treatment protocols in regions affected by armed conflict.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Umum dan Farmasi
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57213/jrikuf.v3i2.619
Primary Topic
Lichen and fungal ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental Health of Combatants vs. Non-Combatants in Middle Eastern Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis

Jurnal Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Umum dan Farmasi
Lichen and fungal ecology
article

Mental Health of Combatants vs. Non-Combatants in Middle Eastern Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis

article en

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the psychological impact differences between individuals who served as combatants and those classified as non-combatants within the context of armed conflicts in the Middle East, through a meta-analysis of 47 independent studies involving a total of 28,463 participants and published between 2010 and 2024. The principal findings of this quantitative synthesis indicate that the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is significantly higher among combatants, reaching 73.8%, compared to non-combatants, who reported a rate of 52.4%, with a large effect size (d=0.89, p<.001). Furthermore, results from multilevel regression analysis reveal that the duration of exposure to conflict is the strongest predictor of PTSD symptoms (β=0.67, p<.001), followed by the intensity of combat, which also contributes significantly (β=0.54, p<.001). In addition, major depression was documented in 64.2% of individuals within the combatant group and 48.7% among non-combatants, with an odds ratio of 2.34 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 1.98 to 2.76. Anxiety disorders were also more prevalent among combatants, at 58.9%, compared to 41.3% in non-combatants, with a relative risk of 1.78 (p<.001). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in coping strategy preferences, with combatants tending to rely more heavily on avoidance mechanisms, recorded at 69.5% versus 45.2% among non-combatants. This meta-analytic finding expands upon the studies by Eltanamly et al. (2021) on war-induced trauma and by Figley & Nash (2011) regarding psychological defense mechanisms, with its distinct contribution lying in the identification of specific patterns of mental disorders influenced by individual roles within conflict dynamics. Overall, this research concludes that combatants exhibit a distinctive pattern of trauma manifestation and demonstrate a higher threshold of resistance to conventional therapeutic interventions, thus making a significant contribution to the formulation of role-based trauma treatment protocols in regions affected by armed conflict.

Jurnal Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Umum dan FarmasiVol. 3(2)
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (ID), State University of Padang (ID), Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID), Meru University of Science and Technology (KE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Lichen and fungal ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.