How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?

Editorial introduction to the special section on Interrogating 'For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers'

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Kent
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22024/unikent/03/fal.1422
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?

University of Kent
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
article

How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?

article en

Abstract

Editorial introduction to the special section on Interrogating 'For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers'

University of Kent
Loughborough University (GB), King's College London (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'? · University of Kent (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS