Screening Strategies for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review of Current Practices and Perspectives

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy, and its incidence has recently increased. Several screening tools have been developed, including the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, cervical methylation test, traditional transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), three-dimensional TVU (3D-TVU), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and direct endometrial sampling. Each screening methods differ in characteristics, cost, and accuracy. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to assess publications offering different perspectives on screening methods for EC and to identitify viable methods in practice, using PubMed and Google Scholar for studies published between 1995 and 2024. In addition, different strategies were summarized, and their cost-effectiveness was evaluated. Results: Known detection methods include various screening tools. Herein, we provide a comparison of current early diagnostic and screening tools for EC and their accuracy, and review existing knowledge on screening methods while identifying viable methods for clinical practice. Currently, no optimal screening method exists for EC. Conclusion: With the increasing global incidence of EC, the demand for effective EC screening is more noteworthy. Concerning cost-effectiveness, convenience, and complications, it has been suggested that TVU or DNA methylation testing in cervical samples may be preferable options. Additionally, differential diagnosis of other etiologies and patient education regarding red-flag signs are also important.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/ceog33417
Primary Topic
Morphological variations and asymmetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening Strategies for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review of Current Practices and Perspectives

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Morphological variations and asymmetry
article

Screening Strategies for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review of Current Practices and Perspectives

article en

Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy, and its incidence has recently increased. Several screening tools have been developed, including the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, cervical methylation test, traditional transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), three-dimensional TVU (3D-TVU), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and direct endometrial sampling. Each screening methods differ in characteristics, cost, and accuracy. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to assess publications offering different perspectives on screening methods for EC and to identitify viable methods in practice, using PubMed and Google Scholar for studies published between 1995 and 2024. In addition, different strategies were summarized, and their cost-effectiveness was evaluated. Results: Known detection methods include various screening tools. Herein, we provide a comparison of current early diagnostic and screening tools for EC and their accuracy, and review existing knowledge on screening methods while identifying viable methods for clinical practice. Currently, no optimal screening method exists for EC. Conclusion: With the increasing global incidence of EC, the demand for effective EC screening is more noteworthy. Concerning cost-effectiveness, convenience, and complications, it has been suggested that TVU or DNA methylation testing in cervical samples may be preferable options. Additionally, differential diagnosis of other etiologies and patient education regarding red-flag signs are also important.

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 52(9)
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW), University of Taipei (TW), Taipei City Hospital (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Morphological variations and asymmetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.