Genealogical Distribution of Sino Japanese Reading on New List of Commonly Used Kanji

In this study, among the 2,136 characters in the New List of Commonly Used Kanji(新常 用漢字表), a total of 2,357 Sino–Japanese readings from 2,069 characters were analyzed based on the traditional group(攝) and rhyme(韻) phonological categories. These readings were classified into five categories: identical Go’on and Kan’on forms, Go’on, Kan’on, To’on, and kan’yo’on. The study ultimately analyzed how the readings from each phonological system are distributed. To determine the reading systems of each character, historical sources were examined to identify how the characters appeared phonetically in ancient phonetic borrowings, and in Go’on, Kan’on, and To’on data. The study also addressed points of contention in classification, dividing them into five main issues. 1) General problems related to character reading notation. 2) Cases where readings in Kikimanyo(記紀万葉) differ from Go’on. 3) Multiple phonetic forms for one rhyme in Go’on. 4) Multiple phonetic forms for one rhyme in Kan’on. As a result of the analysis of the 2,357 readings across the rhyme categories, the following distribution was observed: Kan’on 887 readings(37.63%), Identical Go’on/Kan’on forms 780 readings(33.09%), Go’on 576 readings(24.44%), Kan’yo’on 117 readings(4.96%), To’on 16 readings (0.69%).

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Japanese Studies
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31634/cjs.2025.64.421
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genealogical Distribution of Sino Japanese Reading on New List of Commonly Used Kanji

Comparative Japanese Studies
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Genealogical Distribution of Sino Japanese Reading on New List of Commonly Used Kanji

article en

Abstract

In this study, among the 2,136 characters in the New List of Commonly Used Kanji(新常 用漢字表), a total of 2,357 Sino–Japanese readings from 2,069 characters were analyzed based on the traditional group(攝) and rhyme(韻) phonological categories. These readings were classified into five categories: identical Go’on and Kan’on forms, Go’on, Kan’on, To’on, and kan’yo’on. The study ultimately analyzed how the readings from each phonological system are distributed. To determine the reading systems of each character, historical sources were examined to identify how the characters appeared phonetically in ancient phonetic borrowings, and in Go’on, Kan’on, and To’on data. The study also addressed points of contention in classification, dividing them into five main issues. 1) General problems related to character reading notation. 2) Cases where readings in Kikimanyo(記紀万葉) differ from Go’on. 3) Multiple phonetic forms for one rhyme in Go’on. 4) Multiple phonetic forms for one rhyme in Kan’on. As a result of the analysis of the 2,357 readings across the rhyme categories, the following distribution was observed: Kan’on 887 readings(37.63%), Identical Go’on/Kan’on forms 780 readings(33.09%), Go’on 576 readings(24.44%), Kan’yo’on 117 readings(4.96%), To’on 16 readings (0.69%).

Comparative Japanese StudiesVol. 64
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.