Is Openness in Decline? Data Sharing Between AI Commons, and Predatory Capture

Open Science is meant to make research more transparent, collaborative, and equitable. But with the rise of machine learning and generative AI, new challenges around data sharing have emerged. AI development often depends on publicly shared or scraped data, yet the resulting models and infrastructures are typically closed and corporate-controlled. Thus, researchers increasingly express concern that open data are exploited in ways that strip context, reinforce bias, and concentrate power in proprietary AI systems (Birhane et al., 2022; Jernite et al. 2022, ; Widder et al., 2023; Zueger et al. 2023). In my own research, I have observed growing caution among researchers who once advocated openness. This is not just about lack of incentives but reflects deeper unease with how data circulates and is reused and often misused in AI-driven, commercialized environments. This moderated discussion session aims to learn from researchers and Open Science practitioners about how they experience these tensions. After a 10-minute introduction framing the issues, participants will discuss three guiding questions in three 15-minute rounds, sharing perspectives, dilemmas, and ideas. Contributions via live polls and an online board will help document collective insights and potential paths forward. Birhane, A., Kalluri, P., Card, D., Agnew, W., Dotan, R., & Bao, M. (2022). The values encoded in machine learning research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15590. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.15590 Jernite, Y., Nguyen, H., Biderman, S., Rogers, A., Masoud, M., Danchev, V., Tan, S., Luccioni, A. S., Subramani, N., Johnson, I., Dupont, G., Dodge, J., Lo, K., Talat, Z., Radev, D., Gokaslan, A., Nikpoor, S., Henderson, P., Bommasani, R., & Mitchell, M. (2022). Data governance in the age of large-scale data-driven language technology. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2206–2222. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3534637 Widder, D. G., West, S., & Whittaker, M. (2023). Open (For Business): Big Tech, concentrated power, and the political economy of Open AI. SSRN Scholarly Paper 4543807. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4543807 Züger, T., Asghari, H. AI for the public. How public interest theory shifts the discourse on AI. AI & Soc 38, 815–828 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01480-5

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17304840
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Openness in Decline? Data Sharing Between AI Commons, and Predatory Capture

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Is Openness in Decline? Data Sharing Between AI Commons, and Predatory Capture

article en

Abstract

Open Science is meant to make research more transparent, collaborative, and equitable. But with the rise of machine learning and generative AI, new challenges around data sharing have emerged. AI development often depends on publicly shared or scraped data, yet the resulting models and infrastructures are typically closed and corporate-controlled. Thus, researchers increasingly express concern that open data are exploited in ways that strip context, reinforce bias, and concentrate power in proprietary AI systems (Birhane et al., 2022; Jernite et al. 2022, ; Widder et al., 2023; Zueger et al. 2023). In my own research, I have observed growing caution among researchers who once advocated openness. This is not just about lack of incentives but reflects deeper unease with how data circulates and is reused and often misused in AI-driven, commercialized environments. This moderated discussion session aims to learn from researchers and Open Science practitioners about how they experience these tensions. After a 10-minute introduction framing the issues, participants will discuss three guiding questions in three 15-minute rounds, sharing perspectives, dilemmas, and ideas. Contributions via live polls and an online board will help document collective insights and potential paths forward. Birhane, A., Kalluri, P., Card, D., Agnew, W., Dotan, R., & Bao, M. (2022). The values encoded in machine learning research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15590. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.15590 Jernite, Y., Nguyen, H., Biderman, S., Rogers, A., Masoud, M., Danchev, V., Tan, S., Luccioni, A. S., Subramani, N., Johnson, I., Dupont, G., Dodge, J., Lo, K., Talat, Z., Radev, D., Gokaslan, A., Nikpoor, S., Henderson, P., Bommasani, R., & Mitchell, M. (2022). Data governance in the age of large-scale data-driven language technology. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2206–2222. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3534637 Widder, D. G., West, S., & Whittaker, M. (2023). Open (For Business): Big Tech, concentrated power, and the political economy of Open AI. SSRN Scholarly Paper 4543807. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4543807 Züger, T., Asghari, H. AI for the public. How public interest theory shifts the discourse on AI. AI & Soc 38, 815–828 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01480-5

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Weizenbaum Institute (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.