Comparative Effects of Hydrothermal Recovery Modalities on Physiological Variables in University-Level Athletes: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Background: Recovery strategies are essential for maintaining athletic performance and preventing overtraining. Hydrothermal therapies, including sauna, steam, and whirlpool baths, have gained popularity among athletes; however, their comparative physiological effects remain inadequately characterised. Objective: To compare the effects of sauna bath, steam bath, and whirlpool bath on selected physiological variables, including vital capacity, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood lactate levels in university-level male athletes. Methods: A six-week randomised controlled trial was conducted with 40 university-level male athletes (aged 18-25 years) from Banaras Hindu University. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10 each): a sauna bath group, a steam bath group, a whirlpool bath group, and a control group. Each experimental group received three 20-minute recovery sessions weekly for six weeks following regular training. Physiological measurements were taken before and after the intervention using standardised equipment, including spirometry, oximetry, a sphygmomanometer, and lactate analysis. Results: Significant improvements were observed across multiple physiological parameters in intervention groups compared to controls. Vital capacity increased by 8.61% in the steam group, 6.97% in the sauna group, and 4.76% in the whirlpool group versus 1.27% in controls (p<0.001). Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in the sauna (-6.15%) and steam (-4.55%) groups. Blood lactate clearance was enhanced in all intervention groups: whirlpool (-21.03%), sauna (-19.08%), and steam (-18.05%) compared to minimal change in the control group (-0.72%). Conclusions: All hydrothermal recovery modalities demonstrated significant physiological benefits compared to passive recovery. Steam and sauna therapies were most effective for improving respiratory and cardiovascular function, while whirlpool therapy demonstrated superior lactate clearance. These findings support the integration of hydrothermal recovery strategies in athletic training programs.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17303590
Primary Topic
Complement system in diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effects of Hydrothermal Recovery Modalities on Physiological Variables in University-Level Athletes: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complement system in diseases
article

Comparative Effects of Hydrothermal Recovery Modalities on Physiological Variables in University-Level Athletes: A Randomised Controlled Trial

article en

Abstract

Background: Recovery strategies are essential for maintaining athletic performance and preventing overtraining. Hydrothermal therapies, including sauna, steam, and whirlpool baths, have gained popularity among athletes; however, their comparative physiological effects remain inadequately characterised. Objective: To compare the effects of sauna bath, steam bath, and whirlpool bath on selected physiological variables, including vital capacity, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood lactate levels in university-level male athletes. Methods: A six-week randomised controlled trial was conducted with 40 university-level male athletes (aged 18-25 years) from Banaras Hindu University. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10 each): a sauna bath group, a steam bath group, a whirlpool bath group, and a control group. Each experimental group received three 20-minute recovery sessions weekly for six weeks following regular training. Physiological measurements were taken before and after the intervention using standardised equipment, including spirometry, oximetry, a sphygmomanometer, and lactate analysis. Results: Significant improvements were observed across multiple physiological parameters in intervention groups compared to controls. Vital capacity increased by 8.61% in the steam group, 6.97% in the sauna group, and 4.76% in the whirlpool group versus 1.27% in controls (p<0.001). Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in the sauna (-6.15%) and steam (-4.55%) groups. Blood lactate clearance was enhanced in all intervention groups: whirlpool (-21.03%), sauna (-19.08%), and steam (-18.05%) compared to minimal change in the control group (-0.72%). Conclusions: All hydrothermal recovery modalities demonstrated significant physiological benefits compared to passive recovery. Steam and sauna therapies were most effective for improving respiratory and cardiovascular function, while whirlpool therapy demonstrated superior lactate clearance. These findings support the integration of hydrothermal recovery strategies in athletic training programs.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Complement system in diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Effects of Hydrothermal Recovery Modalities on Physiological Variables in University-Level Athletes: A Randomised Controlled Trial · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS