Demystifying the publication process for Graduate Teaching Assistants and Early Career Researchers - reflections on the impact of Postgraduate Pedagogies, a developmental journal

Having published five issues of Postgraduate Pedagogies, the editorial board wanted to understand more about the impact of our work with the authors. This paper reports on a small anonymous survey containing five free-text questions which was shared with all UK-based authors who have published with the journal. The three research questions explored the support the authors had received and what they felt was useful during the publishing process; what the significance of publishing on pedagogy was for them; and how publishing practices can better accommodate the needs of Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) and Early Career Researchers (ECRs). The analysis found that authors were positive about their experience of publishing with the journal, including the peer review process, and felt they had received a high level of support; they also valued the way the journal centres the voices of GTAs/ECRs which they thought was much needed and still quite rare in UK higher education. In terms of future development, they suggested more bespoke opportunities to get early feedback on article ideas and one-to-one meetings with members of the editorial board to discuss the feedback they received from the peer reviewers. Finally, it was suggested that the journal could do more work to boost its reputation and reach a broader audience. These reflections already play a crucial role in developing the journal so it can continue supporting GTAs/ECRs effectively in the coming years.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Houghton St Press
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82191/pp.95
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demystifying the publication process for Graduate Teaching Assistants and Early Career Researchers - reflections on the impact of Postgraduate Pedagogies, a developmental journal

Houghton St Press
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Demystifying the publication process for Graduate Teaching Assistants and Early Career Researchers - reflections on the impact of Postgraduate Pedagogies, a developmental journal

article en

Abstract

Having published five issues of Postgraduate Pedagogies, the editorial board wanted to understand more about the impact of our work with the authors. This paper reports on a small anonymous survey containing five free-text questions which was shared with all UK-based authors who have published with the journal. The three research questions explored the support the authors had received and what they felt was useful during the publishing process; what the significance of publishing on pedagogy was for them; and how publishing practices can better accommodate the needs of Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) and Early Career Researchers (ECRs). The analysis found that authors were positive about their experience of publishing with the journal, including the peer review process, and felt they had received a high level of support; they also valued the way the journal centres the voices of GTAs/ECRs which they thought was much needed and still quite rare in UK higher education. In terms of future development, they suggested more bespoke opportunities to get early feedback on article ideas and one-to-one meetings with members of the editorial board to discuss the feedback they received from the peer reviewers. Finally, it was suggested that the journal could do more work to boost its reputation and reach a broader audience. These reflections already play a crucial role in developing the journal so it can continue supporting GTAs/ECRs effectively in the coming years.

Houghton St Press
University College Lahore (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.